stat

Monday, October 26, 2009

FORGET JIHADI TERRORISTS! DESTROY MY AMERICAN ENEMIES

OBA-HUSSEIN'S AMERICAN ENEMIES = anyone who disagrees with that I think, how I think and what I want - or dares to say so. So, shut up and OBEY me!


 

Beware! I am evil

Obama's Real Enemies List

By Mark Hyman

Much has been made by the political left of Richard Nixon's infamous enemies list. The reality is most of those named were people who did not receive presidential Christmas cards or White House reception invitations.

In contrast, Barack Obama has a real enemies list the peace prize-winner and his proxies have attacked during the past year, including the minority of news outlets that do not worship the media's latest false idol.

In August 2008, the Obama campaign implored the Justice Department to levy criminal charges against those funding an American Issues Project commercial that proved embarrassing to Obama. Days later, the campaign sent an "Obama Action Wire" to thousands of liberal activists exhorting them to harass Chicago's WGN radio because an on-air guest unearthed university documents that contradicted Obama's claims about his long-time ties to domestic terrorist Bill Ayers.

In the autumn, state prosecutors and top sheriffs in the swing state of Missouri who were prominent Obama supporters complied with a chilling Obama campaign request. The officials threatened to prosecute media outlets that printed or broadcasted material they deemed to be inaccurate about the Democratic nominee.

In the final days before the election, three newspapers that endorsed John McCain were booted from the Obama campaign bus. The New York Post, Dallas Morning News and Washington Times were unceremoniously shown the door immediately after their papers' endorsements appeared and were replaced with Jet and Ebony magazines.

In only his third full day as president Obama personally went on the offensive against a media personality. Obama warned Congressional Republicans against listening to Rush Limbaugh. The man who offered to sit down with Holocaust denier and Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad drew a line in the sand regarding a born-in-the-heartland radio talk show host.

Earlier this year, Justice Department political appointees killed a six-month investigation by career DOJ lawyers into the most blatant voter intimidation case in 40 years. Last November, jack-booted, uniformed, baton-wielding thugs from the New Black Panther Party obstructed a Philadelphia polling location and behaved in an intimidating manner toward white voters, apparently for having the appearance of someone who might possibly vote for McCain.

Only weeks into his term, Obama established several embarrassing presidential firsts including targeting private individuals by names, assigning Shauna Daly a well-known "partisan dirt-digger" and non-lawyer to the White House Counsel's Office to likely gain access to Bush Administration documents protected under attorney-client privilege, and moving the senior political advisor into the West Wing. Daly left the White House after a mere month and returned to the Democratic National Committee where using privileged attorney-client information in opposition research would set a new low in unethical practices.

At the cost of denigrating the Office of the President, Obama's chief political strategist attacked a 21-year-old beauty pageant contestant whose public views were out of step with those of Administration allies. Fifty-four year-old David Axelrod appeared on National Public Radio last May and insisted Carrie Prejean was one of three finalists for the Obama family dog. An NPR studio audience showered Axelrod with cheers. Weeks before, Prejean was victimized by a militant homosexual judge who was angered she did not enthusiastically endorse gay marriage during the Miss USA competition.

Earlier in the spring, the Department of Homeland Security circulated a document warning law enforcement of an alleged threat posed by "domestic rightwing terrorists." Included in the group of potential terrorists were individuals who are pro-life, support the Second Amendment and oppose the flood of illegal aliens. The DHS pamphlet also singled out military veterans as possible domestic terrorists in-waiting.

White House targets include sectors of an entire industry. A common thread among the list of 789 Chrysler dealerships ordered closed by the White House is that the owners donated to GOP candidates, Republican-leaning causes or donated to Hillary Clinton or John Edwards during the Democratic presidential primaries.

Apparently successful franchises such as Chrysler's highest-rated 5-star dealerships were ordered closed in favor of less successful car lots and the consistent discriminator was which political party the owners supported. Reportedly, the closure list was drawn up by the office of the then-car czar, Steven Rattner. It is no surprise that Rattner's wife is Maureen White, the former Democratic National Committee Finance Chair.

Also targeted during the auto industry purge were financial institutions that did not willingly accept Obama's political demands in Chrysler's restructuring. One fund manager reported being on the receiving end of a profanity-laced tirade by Rattner that included threats to use the Internal Revenue Service and the Securities and Exchange Commission in gangster-like enforcement roles.

At mid-year, the White House ordered the firing of Gerald Walpin as Inspector General of the Corporation for National and Community Service after Walpin discovered a key Obama supporter misused federal grant money. Sacramento Mayor Kevin Johnson squandered $850,000 in grant funds to inflate staff salaries and pay for personal services instead of the intended purpose of tutoring impoverished schoolchildren. Walpin's firing was in direct violation of a federal statute barring the removal of an IG without first filing a 30-day notice with Congress.

When the Tea Party movement was at its height, the White House publicized an email address, encouraging supporters to turn-in neighbors who opposed the Obama Administration's socialized medicine proposals. In a similar vein, the White House began collecting and archiving comments from social-networking sites without disclosing these practices to the public.

The Department of Health and Human Services threatened health insurance companies against communicating with their customers over proposed legislative measures implying the agency would punish offenders when it came to Medicare reimbursement.

Color of Change, a deeply partisan group founded by Obama political appointee Van Jones, launched a boycott effort against Fox News personality Glenn Beck. The talk show hosted outed Jones for his crackpot theory that George Bush was complicit in the September 11th terrorist attacks.

In recent weeks, the White House escalated its assault against Fox News, urging other news organizations to sever ties with the news channel. White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel, Communications Director Anita Dunn and Axelrod attacked FNC for -- among other things -- fact-checking false statements made by Veterans Affair assistant secretary Tammy Duckworth. In comparison, the Obama Administration was silent when CNN's Wolf Blitzer hosted a newscast that fact-checked a Saturday Night Live comedy sketch that lampooned Obama.

The Obama Administration has media accomplices when it holds free speech hostage. The New York Times, the self-anointed Praetorian Guard of the First Amendment, editorialized against Fox News and for Obama, omitting troublesome facts and mischaracterizing events. The paper abandoned the role of media watchdog, and served as Obama's lap dog. The New York Times' political support of a controversial leader is reminiscent of events of 75 years ago. It was Richard Euringer, the library director in Essen, Germany, who endeared himself to the regime in the mid-1930s by selecting more than 18,000 works to be burned for not conforming to the Nazi ideology.

Mark Hyman is a commentator appearing nationally on the television stations of Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc.

Friday, October 23, 2009

DID IRAN MURDER THIS SCIENTIST?

10/21/09

British nuclear expert dies in 40-metre plunge
By Thomas Hochwarter

Police are investigating after a British nuclear energy expert involved in negotiations with Iran over its nuclear programme fell 40 metres to his death from a UN building in Vienna.

Officials announced today (Weds) that the man – named as Timothy Hampton – died on the spot yesterday after a fall from the 17th floor at Vienna International Centre (VIC), one of the United Nations’ (UN) main headquarters along with New York, Nairobi and Geneva.

Authorities said the 47-year-old man – a member of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization (CTBTO) – had joined the UN’s current talks with Iran over its nuclear programme.

Investigators refused to reveal any further information on the case but said they ordered an autopsy.

Speaking to the Austrian Times, Anne Thomas – a press spokesperson at the UN in Vienna – said: "All I can confirm is that a male staff member of the CTBTO was found dead at the bottom of a stairwell in the E Building at the Vienna International Centre at 8.30 on Tuesday morning.

"Vienna police are investigating the incident and there is nothing else we can say," she added.

UN staff told the Austrian Times that there had been a similar case recently in which an employee died when he fell from a comparable height.

OBAMA WORSE PRESIDENT THAN BUSH

By Kin CheungB.

Hussein Obama’s approval numbers in the latest Gallup poll have dropped precipitously to the point where they are in very grave territory and, furthermore, reflect very incriminatingly on a president whose policies are enormously unpopular. The Gallup Daily tracking poll has found that Obama’s second-to-third-quarter drop in his ratings is the WORST EVER for a sitting president in his first year in office and, to boot, also one of the worst, quarter-to-quarter drops for ANY president ever! Tell that to the minority of Americans who still support this increasingly naked emperor, huh?!

For the third quarter (July 20 to October 19), Obama’s approval was a paltry 53%. This mortifying number is well below the average approval rating of his first two quarter’s rating of his first year, both of which average over 60%.

According to Gallup, this careening fall in Obama’s numbers can be attributed mostly to his ill-fated and reckless push for "healthcare reform" (read: ideological push for Obamacare, which seeks to turn the world’s best healthcare system into a third-world system reminiscent of England and Canada) along with, naturally, the US’ worsening unemployment rate of nearly 10%, which is, of course, something Obama specifically denied would even come close to happening as long as his deficit-causing bailout was passed!

To put this in yet some more context and perspective, only three other presidents (two of which were Democrats), Truman, Ford and Clinton, suffered worse point drops in any quarter of their presidencies.

This disastrous drop in Obama’s approval ratings in such a short time is particularly damning and telling when we consider the fact that the liberal MSM is still 110% in his corner and has been slanting all their coverage to help him out with his very unpopular policies! However, a plurality of the American people clearly deserve kudos for seeing through the bad policies of this very unpopular president who also is becoming an emperor without clothing very quickly.

To put into incontrovertible comparison just how awful this disapproval against Obama is, even GW Bush’s ratings at this time in his presidency—surely, you remember "Dubya," said by all the "wise" liberals to be the "worst" president in US history, mainly because he largely did what was right for the US without caring so much about opinion pollswere tons better than Obama.

In fact, according to the same Gallup poll, "Dubya" had a whopping 72% of Americans who approved of his performance at the same point in his presidency while only a laughably mediocre 53% approve of Obama!

Sunday, October 18, 2009

OBAMA AND THE DEMOCRATS SIMPLY DON'T CARE

President Obama and the Democrats

They Don’t Care!

By Alan Caruba

It has finally dawned on me why President Obama and the Democrats in control of the Congress rushed to pass an unread “stimulus” bill “redistributing” billions of taxpayer dollars, have been voting bills out of committee to “reform” our national healthcare system, and another to impose a huge tax on all energy use.

They don’t care.

They don’t care that the polls clearly demonstrate that the majority of Americans oppose these and other initiatives.

They don’t care that the time-tested and time-proven way out of a recession is to cut taxes.

They don’t care that a similar healthcare program in Massachusetts did not reduce costs, that funding was slashed, and that rationing began.

They don’t care that there is absolutely no need for a bill to regulate carbon dioxide in order to “stop global warming” and that it is a huge tax increase on all Americans at a time when the Earth has been cooling for the last ten years.

They don’t care.

These are people like David Axelrod, the President’s advisor, who dismissed the hundreds of thousands of people who came to Washington, D.C. on September 12th to protest, saying, “They’re wrong.”

It is obvious that President Obama doesn’t care.

There is a complete disconnect between what he says and what he does. One could prepare a very long list of promises and statements made during his campaign and since his inauguration that reveal an astounding and frightening level of daily mendacity.

As for Congress, the rush to pass legislation such as healthcare reform that had been examined during the Clinton years—and rejected—is the single greatest indicator of how bad the outcome of this “new” effort will be. This is a bill being put together out of sight of the public because, if they knew its provisions, they would lay siege to Congress to stop it. Indeed, they already have. It won’t even be posted on the Internet for public review.

They don’t care.

It’s the same attitude that was demonstrated by the Nobel Prize committee that awarded Obama its Peace Prize barely two weeks after he was inaugurated, announcing it to a stunned world months later when it was apparent to everyone that he had done nothing to earn what was formerly one of the highest international accolades.

They don’t care.

The systematic efforts to extend control over all the land and all the waters of the United States through government agencies such as the EPA, the Fish and Wildlife Service, and the Corp of Engineers runs counter to the Constitutional Amendment protecting the sacredness of private property.

They don’t care.

It is increasingly evident that President Obama may, in fact, not be a natural born citizen of the United States as required by the Constitution to hold the office. Far too many essential documents have been withheld from public review to not legitimately question this fundamental issue of legal authority. A Democrat Congress will not take this up, but the courts must.

I am reminded that the Declaration of Independence was a long list of grievances set forth by Thomas Jefferson who wrote “when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object, evinces a design to reduce them (the People) under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government and to provide such new guards for their future security.”

Barring a complete change of power in Congress in next year’s midterm elections, it
is beginning to look like a new Declaration will have to be written as this administration and this Congress continue to run roughshod over the will of the People to bring about their enslavement and the destruction of the nation.

They don’t care!

Friday, October 16, 2009

FALSE IDOLS AND IMAGERY OF OBAMINATION

Protecting the Image
Oliver North
Friday, October 16, 2009

WASHINGTON -- The U.S. dollar isn't the only currency headed to new lows. After months of drifting along in "the winds of change," America's diplomatic credibility is sinking alongside the greenback. The Obama White House and the so-called mainstream media -- preoccupied with hoopla over "health care reform," meaningless drivel about the 2016 Olympics and the vacuous award of a Nobel Peace Prize -- barely have noticed the water flooding into our ship of state. Unfortunately, the Iranians, North Koreans, Russians and the Taliban all have been paying attention. Don't count on any of them to help bail out our boat.



On Sept. 17, less than a week before he was scheduled to deliver his Utopian "world without nuclear weapons" speech at the annual U.N. General Assembly seance, Mr. Obama announced that he was abandoning plans for ballistic missile defense installations in Poland and the Czech Republic. Commentators around the world drooled all over themselves commending the move as a step toward building "a new era of respect" and noting that the "initiative" would be "welcomed in Moscow."

Mr. Obama's presentation to the assembly Sept. 23 and his speech to the U.N. Security Council's summit on "nuclear non-proliferation and nuclear disarmament" Sept. 24 were celebrated for their "breadth and understanding" and his "appeal for dialogue in the quest for world peace." But the O-Team's careful choreography collapsed just hours later, when Iran's secret uranium enrichment facility, buried in the mountains near the holy city of Qom, was exposed.

In the aftermath, it was revealed that Mr. Obama had known about the site since January. When asked why he failed to mention the Iranian malfeasance in both of his U.N. addresses, a White House spokesman said the administration didn't want "to spoil the image of success" during Mr. Obama's debut at the U.N.

Of course, the problem isn't "image"; it's reality. And the reality is that the Iranian pursuit of nuclear weapons has continued unabated for at least a decade. U.S. intelligence confirmed that Tehran was building its underground enrichment facility at Nantez in early 2002. Since then, the U.S., the Europeans and the U.N.'s toothless International Atomic Energy Agency have been aware that Iran has continued to build multiple centrifuge arrays for refining "weapons-grade" nuclear material. An arms-control scientist says the facility at Qom probably can produce "sufficient fissile material to produce one or two multi-kiloton-yield nuclear weapons per year."

The Qom revelation prompted what appeared to be a new consensus for united action against the Iranian regime. French President Nicolas Sarkozy went so far as to say: "I support the Americans' outstretched hand. But what did the international community gain from these offers of dialogue? Nothing."

In the U.S., Democrats, long opposed to confronting Iran, appeared to set aside their internal divisions over health care reform to howl in unusual unison. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, long admired for her pacifism, ominously warned: "An Iran with nuclear weapons is simply unacceptable. ... We must use the tools at our disposal -- from diplomacy to sanctions -- to stop Iran's march toward nuclear capability."

Even the Iranians suddenly appeared to be more pliant. On Oct. 1, at a much-hyped meeting in Geneva, Tehran's nuclear negotiators sat down with U.S., British, French, Russian, Chinese and German officials to discuss "continuing activities within the framework of the Non-Proliferation Treaty." There the Iranians agreed that in exchange for Russian "enrichment of nuclear material for electrical generation," they would sit down for another chat in Vienna on Oct. 19 and "invite" International Atomic Energy Agency inspectors to visit the previously undisclosed Qom enrichment facility Oct. 25.

Now we know it was all for show. On Oct. 9, cleric Mojtaba Zolnour, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei's representative to the Revolutionary Guard, said, "Should a single American or Zionist missile land in our country, before the dust settles, Iranian missiles will blow up the heart of Israel." Then on Monday, Oct. 12, Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Hassan Qashqavi said: "We have announced repeatedly that our nuclear rights are not negotiable. Threats and sanctions are useless."

It's not just the Iranians who are doing damage to the Obama "image." On Tuesday, Oct. 13, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton met in Moscow with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov to discuss a new Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty and the "Iranian nuclear problem." Afterward, Lavrov told the press, "Threats, sanctions and threats of pressure in the current situation, we are convinced, would be counterproductive."

That's reality. And to make sure the O-Team got the message, on Wednesday, Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin, speaking from Beijing, added: "If we speak about some kind of sanctions now, before we take concrete steps, we will fail to create conditions for favorable negotiations. We believe that we should treat this issue with caution, and there is no need to scare the Iranians."

Mr. Obama has trotted the globe burnishing his image -- and apologizing for America. He already has visited 16 countries. Next month, he will visit four more. He's already the legitimate winner of the "Most Traveled President Award." It's time for him to face reality -- before it is too late.

Sunday, October 11, 2009

SIMILAR TO WHAT OBA-HUSSEIN IS DOING IN THE USA

Revolutionary Guards buy 51% stake in Iran's telecommunications company

By- Robert Tait


Iran's Revolutionary Guards have bought a controlling stake in the country's telecommunications company, fuelling suspicions that the organisation is quietly staging a military takeover.

Tose'e Etemad Mobin, a consortium controlled by the guards, paid £5bn for a 51% stake under a privatisation scheme. It was claimed that a rival enterprise had been unfairly excluded from the bidding process because it lacked appropriate "security qualifications".

Critics have warned that the deal exposes ordinary people, especially political activists, to intensified spying and electronic surveillance.

The news came days after the governor of Iran's central bank, Mahmoud Bahmani, announced that a finance company owned by the Revolutionary Guards, the Ansar Institute, had been cleared to become a fully fledged bank.

The Revolutionary Guards - formed in 1979 to safeguard the Islamic revolution - have built a financial empire with interests including oil and gas fields, airports and eye and dental clinics during the presidency of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, himself a former member. The empire has been awarded building and engineering contracts worth billions of pounds and is thought to control the smuggling of contraband into Iran.

Its own high street bank would be the most public demonstration yet of the inroads the institution has made into the country's economy. Ansar was originally established to give credit-free loans to the poor but was upgraded to become a recognised financial credit organisation after Ahmadinejad's first election victory in 2005. The president rejected complaints from economists that it was not subject to proper controls.

"This new bank is one of many recent steps intended to complete the dominance of the Revolutionary Guards in Iran," said Jamshid Assadi, an Iranian economist based at the ESC Groupe business school in Dijon, France. "They are now very active, indeed dominant, in many sectors of the Iranian economy. They were not involved in oil and gas before but now under Ahmadinejad, they are."

The telecoms takeover has provoked accusations that the government's privatisation programme - required under Iran's constitution - is a sham designed to sell state assets to the Revolutionary Guards.

The Expediency Council, an influential state body headed by Hashemi Rafsanjani, Ahmadinejad's most powerful political rival, has promised to investigate the purchase, along with other privatisations conducted over the past two years.

Mohammad Nourizad, a pro-fundamentalist journalist who broke with the hardliners over the bloody crackdown that followed Ahmadinejad's disputed re-election last June, warned that it would be used to step up monitoring of the government's opponents.

"Getting access to telecommunications management has always been vital for the security requirements of the revolutionary guards and the iron men behind the scenes," he wrote in a blog. "It means control over the country's entire telecommunications system, including landline telephones, mobiles, text messages, the internet and any other stuff linked to telecommunications. After that, it's a piece of cake . to trace people."

The authorities are widely believed to have used telecommunications technology to keep tabs on post-election protest organisers by intercepting mobile calls and text messages andby hacking into email accounts.

Thursday, October 08, 2009

CYBER ATTACK BEING TESTED AGAINST OUR FORCES

Alan comment: WHILE THE OBA-HUSSEIN-KHOMEINI administration of certifiable weirdos plan on how to take over the Internet to prevent communication among our citizens (as part of enslaving us in their Marxist USSA) and use a product endorsement by Blogs as a reason to close them down. All of us are  their perceived enemy, we the American people!

Meanwhile they ignore the  real enemies who are doing to them what they want to do to us. They think we are their enemy because they plan to harm us and expect us to react, so they plan our inarceration

Hat tip Steve Quail

======================================================= 

Massive Cyber Attacks on U.S. & British Military Communications

What ya gonna do when the sats and computers go down? A primer in communications -urgent return to the past for communications back up.



October 7, 2009
Hawk

Yesterday on October 6, 2009 several acts of war against the U.S. and the U.K. were perpetrated and very few know about it. No it was not bullets, mortars, missiles, or even IEDS in Afghanistan or Iraq.......but the blows were none less telling in the world of 3 C's ........Command, Control, and Communications.

Apparently, the entire National Communications Center capability to communicate went down at Andrews at least for enough of a duration to cause extreme consternation and a designation of RED. As many know, this is a vital Communications Center for the U.S. Military, Intelligence community, and the Commander In Chief. It going down caused numerous problems and no doubt many questions asked.

It may be no wonder to those who follow such events why the President decided to give a visit and a Speech to the main Counter Terror Fusion Hive somewhere in D.C. and its environs nearby of Puzzle Land or Ole Virginny. Oh, some may say, that because of all the attacks upon the Intel community by this President and his comrades, along with Speaker Pelosi in the House, and the recent down dressing of General McChrystal for breaking chain of command to beg for more troops in Afghanistan by Obama adviser General Jones (RET.) may have prompted this visit to work some MAJIC and shore up his relationship with those with actually higher clearance levels. Others might say that because of rumored up to $500,000 bounties offered to those who would turn in any of their high level INTEL / MIL brethren who dare oppose or hold different political views than those of the King Tut to the World, that in fact so much $$$ have been spread in order to Purge the INTEL/ MIL world of Constitutionalists, Christians, and Anti-Communist factions within the U.S. that in fact he has at least some willing friendly minions there. That is all intrigue and info from deep pools. I contend that it was necessary to visit because Communications were hampered somewhat and the deep underground Counter Terror Bunker has not only dedicated communications, and power generation .........but also they might have just been able to tell this President who may have taken down Andrews comm capability, whether it was related to a similar incident that affected MI-6 and GCHQ across the pond in the U.K. which will be discussed shortly, and whether it was related to the upcoming War in the Mideast beginning with Israel vs. Iran. Or, just to add fuel to the Illuminati generated ORDO AB CHAO under some luciferian faction plan. Anyway, someone had better know how to prevent these unprecedented in scope ,attacks on the key U.S. military facilities.

He went to be able to communicate and found out that this world is not revolving around his personal Alinskyesque attempts to overwhelm the U. S. into forming some new AMERO INTERNATIONALE de Lucie and that WAR IS GETTING READY TO COME TO TOWN AS THE U.S. DOLLAR AND BANKING SYSTEM ARE READY TO COLLAPSE . That some nations just might take advantage of that and do perhaps have the will to strike death blows to the United States in spite of her Military capabilities, may have just turned on a light bulb that this ain't play acting to win an election. In this world it is really hard anymore to just "Glow" your way to victory.

The U.K. situation yesterday apparently was a massive deep hack and the resultant cyber-purloining of approx. 2000 pages of the Queen's MI-6 deepest current secrets relating perhaps to operational details of clandestine agenteur, current INTEL operations, and future plans for a variety of target nations around the world. That these "Dirty Knickers" were spread all over the Internet throughout the Eurozone prior to a quick takedown by GCHQ and MI-6 caused great wailing and consternation in the British circles of power. Understandably so as this amounts to war.

Curiously though, yesterday also had a UN group comment that the next World War will be fought in Cyberspace.........is there any linkage of these cyber generated attacks to the fact that certain UN working groups were addressing that very issue or that in nearly every country belabored Elites like Senator Rocky Oil want to take away the Internet from the people because they are losing control of the masses of sheep they have been feeding upon.

So, the questions abound who did these massive attacks in cyberspace. Best guesses are:

1. Red Chinese who already have been caught compromising the entire U.S. Govt, Mil. and Intel computer net works. Of course DHS having a contract with Tsinghua University computer experts in a Metro Columbus, Ohio branch campus office? Why should be addressed quickly.

2. Russians who do have a treaty of defense with Iran and who have the will to launch on CONUS and the U.K. if they support an Israeli attack upon Iran. Both countries have been probed heavily by Russian Bombers and Subs very recently in a new "cold war like" show of force by the Bear. Large numbers of Spetsnaz and GRU sleepers are very active in the U.S. and U.K. Their overall Mil capability is not what it once was, but they did pay off their Club of Paris Debt and with oil going to go to Pluto they will contest just how this "New World Order" is to be structured.

3. Iran herself who has to perhaps work the asymmetrical angles as much as possible with an almost guaranteed pending Israeli attack coming against their nuclear material and warhead development facilities.

4. Israeli Mossad perhaps to create a false flag cyber attack in order to gain guaranteed actual Military and Financial support from the U.S. and U.K.
IE. Pin the false tail on the Iranians and Russians so that the U.S. and the U.K. will go along with the attacks coming on Tehran, Qom. Isfahan, and other Iranian cities.

5. some luciferian Cabal wanting to just fuel ORDO AB CHAO and throw the world into 6th gear on a slippery track of abandon.

Regardless, the point here is that a return to the tried and true nearly indestructible older communications methods of the Cold War 50s for back-up purposes is in order. Industrial strength HF transmitters that can cut through nearly any amount of bad propo, antennas that can receive HF from Alpha Draconis or Adam and Eve through time/space. Analog, tubes, and hard wires that were not susceptible to electro magnetic pulse detonation might just want to be considered to be reactivated. Also, Military and Intel rank and file should be trained once again in all forms signalling and comm including Morse Code, Flag and Pennant codes, older HF radio systems, and any so called antiquated method of signals including smoke signals and the native drum if necessary.

All this hardware with soooooo too many Chinese Chips inside outsourced in De-industrialization of the U.S. by greedy and evil men, can soon mean that you cannot project much power anywhere if the orders to send them into to battle cannot even be given or if the threat of an incoming bogey 110 nautical miles off the east coast CONUS cannot be communicated properly to command who can interdict the threat. Recall also the unscheduled forced landing of Air Force 2 with Daarth Duvhunter aboard who ended up talking to some Chinese at their whim at a Singapore airport. They even described the sequence of the chips that were turned off inside that aircraft. Why did the U.S. let Boeing ever create that manufacturing line inside Red China?

So, what you gonna do? what you gonna do when the Sats get killed and the Computers get Hacked? Well, you had better have back up as at that point it becomes a much more confused and local battlefield and some enemy just take your Command Post with a club or a rock, just as Einstein warned about many years ago. Regenerate complete U.S. manufacture of military micro chips, hire and pay well dedicated U.S. service personnel instead of mercenary contractors and mixed allegiance corporate Illuminati who hire foreign techno zombies with no allegiance to America. Create a true multi-level Communications redundancy and one as simple and tough a KABAR knife. One that could be drenched in an Asian swamp or used at the frozen Chosin again or could be hidden in a Shanghai apartment and easily serviced and used even after EMP strikes or during if you please.

Wake up Good Guys in MIL/ INTEL.........We don't have much time left.

Hawk



Other essays by Hawk

Wednesday, October 07, 2009

VERY EXPENSIVE "CHEAP" TOMATOES

Cheap Tomatoes

THIS HAS GOT TO BE PASSED ALONG TO AS MANY AS POSSIBLE OR WE WILL ALL GO DOWN THE DRAINBECAUSE A FEW DON'T CARE.

This English teacher has phrased it the best I've seen yet..
Tomatoes and Cheap Labor

CHEAP TOMATOES?
This should make everyone think, be you Democrat, Republican or Independent

From a California school teacher - - -


"As you listen to the news about the student protests over illegal immigration, there are some things that you should be aware of:

I am in charge of the English-as-a-second-language department at a large southern California high school which is designated a Title 1 school, meaning that its students average lower socioeconomic
and income levels

Most of the schools you are hearing about, South Gate High, Bell Gardens , Huntington Park , etc., where these students are protesting, are also Title 1 schools.

Title 1 schools are on the free breakfast and free lunch program. When I say free breakfast, I'm not talking a glass of milk and roll -- but a full breakfast and cereal bar with fruits and juices that would make a Marriott proud. The waste of this food is monumental, with trays and trays of it being dumped in the trash uneaten.

I estimate that well over 50% of these students are obese or at least moderately overweight. About 75% or more DO have cell phones. The school also provides day care centers for the unwed teenage pregnant girls (some as young as 13) so they can attend class without the inconvenience of having to arrange for babysitters or having family watch their kids.

I was ordered to spend $700,000 on my department or risk losing
funding for the upcoming year even though there was little need for anything; my budget was already substantial. I ended up buying new computers for the computer learning center, half of which, one month later, have been carved with graffiti by the appreciative students who obviously feel humbled and grateful to have a free education in America ..

I have had to intervene several times for young and substitute teachers whose classes consist of many illegal immigrant students, here in the country less then 3 months, who raised so much hell with the female teachers, calling them "Putas"(whores) and throwing things, that the teachers were in tears.

Free medical, free education, free food, day care
etc., etc, etc. Is it any wonder they feel entitled to not only be in this country but to demand rights, privileges and entitlements?

To those who want to point out how much these illegal immigrants contribute to our society because they LIKE their gardener and housekeeper and they like to pay less for tomatoes: spend some time in the real world of illegal immigration and see the TRUE costs.

Higher insurance, medical facilities closing, higher medical costs, more crime, lower standards of education in our schools, overcrowding, new diseases etc., etc, etc. For me, I'll pay more for tomatoes.

Americans, We need to wake up.

It does, however, have everything to do with culture: It involves an American third-world culture that does not value education, that accepts children getting pregnant and dropping out of school by 15 and that refuses to assimilate, and an American culture that has become so weak and worried about"politicalcorrectness" that we don't have the will to do anything about it.

If this makes your blood boil, as it did mine, forward this to everyone you know.

CHEAP LABOR? Isn't that what the whole immigration issue is about?

Business doesn't want to pay a decent wage.

Consumers don't want expensive produce.

Government will tell you Americans don't want the jobs.

But the bottom line is cheap labor. The phrase "cheap labor" is a myth, a farce, and a lie. There is no such thing as "cheap labor."

Take, for example, an illegal alien with a wife and five children. He takes a job for
$5.00 or 6.00/hour. At that wage, with six dependents, he pays no income tax, yet at the end of the year, if he files an Income Tax Return, he gets an "earned income credit" of up to $3,200 free.

He qualifies for Section 8 housing and subsidized rent.

He qualifies for food stamps.

He qualifies for free (no deductible, no co-pay) health care.

His children get free breakfasts and lunches at school.

He requires bilingual teachers and books.

He qualifies for relief from high energy bills.

If they are, or become, aged, blind or disabled, they qualify for SSI. If qualified for SSI they can qualify forMedicare . All of this is at (our) taxpayer's expense.

He doesn't worry about car insurance, life insurance, or homeowners insurance.

Taxpayers provide Spanish language signs, bulletins and printed material.

He and his family receive the equivalent of $20.00 to $30.00/hour in benefits.

Working Americans
are lucky to have $5.00 or $6..00/hour left after paying their bills and his.

Cheap labor? YEAH RIGHT!

THESE ARE THE QUESTIONS WE SHOULD BE ADDRESSING TO THE CONGRESSIONAL MEMBERS OF EITHER PARTY. 'AND WHEN THEY LIE TO US AND DON'T DO AS THEY SAY, WE SHOULD REPLACE THEM AT ONCE!'