Monday, May 31, 2010


Pres of Howard Jarwis association:"Damon Dunn was endorsed in the beginning of the campaign when he ran unopposed"

Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ
26302 La az ste 211
Mission Viejo, CA 92691
Phone: 949-683-5411
Fax: 949-586-2082

Campaign Newsletter

Dr. Orly Taitz for CA Secretary of State"

Today Jon Coupal, president of Howard Jarwis association and Dr. Orly Taitz, Republican candidate has given a speech for Republican club of Laguna Woods.

Dr. Taitz was well received. Most attendees expressed their desire to vote for her. When the president of the club announced that Dr. Taitz is an attorney conducting most legal actions to bring to light Obama's birth certificate and other records, it drew the biggest applause of the day. While Pro-Obama main stream media is hounding the voters and Republican leaders with statements, that seeking the truth about Obama, is an embarrassmet for the Republican party, most rank and file Republicans and patriots of this country believe that having a president who refuses to unseal his original birth certificate, provide an explanation why he is using someone else's social security number and who decides to vacation in Chicago instead of visiting Arlington memorial on Memorial day-is an embarassment to the country as a whole.

Mr. Coupal has explained to the voters that the reason opponent of Dr. Taitz, Damon Dunn is listed as endorsed by Howard Jarwis association, is that he ran unopposed fron November 5th 2009 until end of February. He sought endorsement very agressively and was endorsed when he ran unopposed.

Actually most endorsements received by Damon Dunn were received in that initial period, when he ran unopposed and organizarions and public at large were not aware of the fact that he was a lifelong Democrat, that he didn't disclose this information in his voter registration card and later called Fl, asking to delete this information from his record, while not advising the registrar of voters and CA secretary of State about his prior voter registration.
PDF: New pleadings filed today in Taitz v Obama, Judge Royce Lamberth Washington DC Posted on | May 24, 2010 | 3 Comments

New pleadings filed today in Taitz v Obama, Judge Royce Lamberth Washington DC

Category: Uncategorized

New pleadings filed today in Taitz v Obama, Judge Royce Lamberth Washington DC Posted on | May 24, 2010 | 4 Comments

U.S. District Court

District of Columbia

Notice of Electronic Filing

The following transaction was entered on 5/24/2010 at 6:43 PM and filed on 5/24/2010

Case Name: TAITZ v. OBAMA
Case Number: 1:10-cv-00151-RCL
WARNING: CASE CLOSED on 04/14/2010
Document Number: 30

Docket Text:
SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM to re [29] Reply to opposition to Motion filed by ORLY TAITZ. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 05.18.10 letter from SSA, # (2) Exhibit 05.19.10 Death threat)(TAITZ, ORLY) 1:10-cv-00151-RCL Notice has been electronically mailed to:

Alan Burch


Dr. Orly Taitz, esq

29839 Santa Margarita Parkway, STE 100

Rancho Santa Margarita CA 92688

Tel: (949) 683-5411; Fax (949) 766-7603







v. § Civil Action: 10-151 RCL

Barack Hussein Obama, § ADDENDUM TO REPLY TO



Defendant. §


Your Honor,

Part of the complaint in this action is a FOIA request. Mr. Obama, defendant in this case, via US attorney’s office sought dismissal of a FOIA request due to the fact that the refusal of information request by the Social Security administration was not final. Your Honor initially agreed, stating that the response from the Social Security administration was not final.

Until now Taitz could not obtain a response from SSN, stating that it is a final decision.

Yesterday Taitz received a letter from Jonathan R. Cantor, Executive Director of Office of Privacy and Disclosure of the Social Security Administration dated and signed May 18, 2010. (Exhibit 1 Letter and envelope) As a stroke of providence the letter states “This is our final decision in this matter. If you still believe the decision is incorrect, however, the law permits you to seek review in a district court of the United States”.

As such an impediment was lifted, and the Plaintiff respectfully requests this Honorable court to grant her motion for reconsideration, so that the matter can be heard on the merits.

Legal Argument

In regards to the content of the response from the Social Security Administration, it relies on the finding of Department of Justice v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, 489 U.S. 749 (1989).

It concedes following points:

1.Under 5U.S.C. §552(b)(6) exemption from the FOIA Taitz can obtain Obama’s application for the Social Security without Obama’s consent, if other conditions are fulfilled.

2. Social security or court cannot consider the identity of the requester- therefore the court cannot deny Taitz request due to her lack of standing or lack of particularized injury

3.Social Security or courts cannot consider the purpose for which the person requests the information.

4.Social security administration is obligated to provide information, if there is a public interest in knowing how SSA administers the Social Security Act.

5.The only objection to Taitz request by the SSA, is their claim that “disclosure of records containing personal information about President Obama would not shed light on how the agency performs its statutory duties”. This is the reason SSA provides as justification for their refusal to provide the information in question.

6.Taitz appeals this decision on following grounds:

7.Official on line records of Selective service confirm that Barack Obama has been using SS number 042-68-4425.

8.Information requested does not represent personal information of Mr. Obama, but rather personal information of another individual born in 1890, who would have been 120 years old, who is most probably deceased, but whose death was either never reported to the Social Security Administration or was deleted from the records of the Social Security Administration prior or around 1986, and the number was unlawfully assumed by Mr. Obama.

According to previously submitted sworn affidavit of recently retired senior deportation officer with the department of Homeland Security Mr. John Sampson, this Social Security number was issued to another individual in the state of Connecticut between 1976-1977, while Obama never resided there.

9.One of the printouts provided by Mr. Sampson show Mr. Obama’s origin in Equatorial Guiney, which is different from the official information stating his origin to be Hawaii and Kenya.

10.According to previously submitted sworn affidavit from Susan Daniels, licensed private investigator, certified by the Department of Homeland Security, this Social Security number was issued in the state of Connecticut between 1976-1977, to an individual born in 1890.

As Mr. Obama never resided in CT and was not born in 1890, Ms. Daniels concludes that this is not his SS number. Ms. Daniels provided a follow up report, showing that according to multiple national databases there are numerous Social Security numbers connected to name Barack Obama and Michelle Obama, none of which were issued in Hawaii.

11.According to memoirs by Mr. Obama, such as Dreams From My Father Mr. Obama started working in Baskin Robbins store in Honolulu HI around 1975-1976, he needed SS number to obtain employment, and he would have had to obtain a SS number from HI, not CT.

12.According to a previously submitted sworn Affidavit by retired elite Scotland Yard officer of anti organized crime and anti communist proliferation units Mr. Neil Sankey, there are multiple records in National databases, showing Obama using multiple Social Security numbers, which are either numbers of deceased individuals or numbers never assigned, none of which were issued in HI.

13.According to the sworn declaration by forensic export Sandra Ramsey-Lines, Obama’s short version certification of live birth provided to the public cannot be considered as genuine without forensic examination of the original birth certificate, which Obama refuses to unseal.

Lack of valid original birth certificate with the name of the doctor and the name of the hospital and signatures, could attest to the foreign birth and could explain the need to seek SS numbers of deceased individuals and numbers never assigned.

14.Madeleine Payne Dunham, Obama’s maternal grandmother, used to volunteer in Oahu circuit court probate department, where she was able to obtain SS numbers of deceased in individuals. Additionally, both Ms. Payne and Obama’s mother Ann Dunham(Obama, Soetoro) worked as loan officers and had an opportunity to view SS numbers of others.

15.As the public has a right to know how SSA performs its statutory duties, the public has a right to know how Obama obtained these SS numbers, and see the original application for SS number 042-68-4425, as well as other numbers used by Obama according to National databases.

16.Without such disclosure the public will have no trust and confidence that SSA properly performs its statutory duties, specifically in light of the fact that an individual occupying the highest office in the land, could get there using Social Security numbers of others.

17.Public has a right to know, what happens to estates of individuals, who are deceased, and whose death was never reported.

18.The public has a right to know if this breach of SSA is limited to Obama, or whether it is widespread.

m. Taitz would venture to submit to the court, that there was never a more justified need for a disclosure, as there is in this case, with a SSN wrongfully assumed and used by a President and Commander in Chief.

Taitz will be willing to consent to have initial discovery under seal and in camera. (In private).

1.Taitz is requesting discovery to be done expeditiously, as she is continuously subjected to death threats Exhibit 2, which would not stop, as long as this mystery exists and there is an incentive for some to intimidate attorneys seeking answers. Taitz has a family and three children, which makes this matter more urgent.

Wherefore, Taitz respectfully requests this Honorable court to grant her motion for reconsideration.



Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. (California Bar 223433)

Attorney for the Plaintiffs

29839 Santa Margarita Parkway ste 100

Rancho Santa Margarita CA 92688

Tel.: 949-683-5411; Fax: 949-766-7603




Alan Burch, Assistant United States Attorney for the District of Columbia

555 4th str.,N.W.


/s/Orly Taitz

Dr. Orly Taitz Esq

29839 Santa Margarita PKWY

Rancho Santa Margarita CA 92688

Sunday, May 30, 2010


Alan Note: BTW Legislators(!) in Arizona are joining hands with Mexico to take Arizona to trial in the International Court in The Hague to oppose the new Arizona Immigration law!

International law to trump national law and our best interests for those of Mexico?

With American legislators like these who needs enemies? Nor with the current White House occupants dismantling America section by section to suit their madness.


In a surprise, the administration yesterday pledged 1,200 National Guard to be sent to the border. Added surveillance would be their job. The cost: $500 million. It looks like a lot of money. But by comparison, for example, we spend $720 million a year sending condoms to the third world.

Alan note: We need at least TEN THOUSAND guardsmen to begin to control our southern borders and deal with the terrorists coming in with the Drug cartel submersibles (shallow water submarines).


And elsewhere in America, organizations such as La Raza, Maldef, LULAC, and Azlatan get millions in public money to keep the border open. In my state of Maryland, Casa de Maryland openly helps migrants illegally in the United States. It receives $4 million from the state of Maryland and Montgomery County out of a total budget of $9.5 million a year. Amazingly, President Hugo Chavez of Venezuela’s gives them $1 million a year.

Illegal immigration costs Maryland taxpayers at least $1.4 billion a year in health, education and incarceration. At a recent community event in Maryland, a veteran liberal legislator Anna Gutierrez told me there was no problem in Casa de Maryland receiving funding to help illegal immigrants. She explained: “They are just helping them.” As for Chavez, that was fine because “Venezuela is a model for Latin and Central American development.” By way of background, when in 2008 I testified before the Maryland assembly that illegal aliens should not be given drivers licenses, she told Mexico television which was covering the hearings, “There are no illegals in America; these people are simply waiting to adjust their status”.

Why would anyone hold up Venezuela as any kind of economic model? It would be like favoring Greece for “budget discipline.” Inflation in the country is over 30 percent and may reach twice that. Unemployment is skyrocketing. Corruption is rampant. Chavez has so mismanaged the economy the country does not produce enough coffee for domestic consumption for the first time ever. The currency has dropped in value by over half as Chavez prints money wildly. The only thing Chavez is doing is causing people to flee. Do this throughout the America’s and everyone will be in the United States soon!

But it is worse. Chavez is knee deep in a terrorist conspiracy to ship Russian weapons to terrorist organizations – Hezbollah – and criminal drug cartels – FARC – to facilitate terrorist acts against the United States, including blowing up pipelines carrying oil to the United States. He has also promised to ship both uranium to Iran to help Tehran make nuclear weapons material and oil to help break a possible refined petroleum products sanctions law now before the U.S. Congress. All this is public knowledge.

Casa de Maryland condemns those who advocate effective limits on immigration as racists, as does Chavez. It has threatened civil disobedience should the U.S. Congress not approve amnesty. It publishes pamphlets that instruct people to refuse to cooperate with immigration and law enforcement officials. Why are we giving tax-exempt status to those who actively seek to leave unprotected our borders while supporting themselves with funds from terror supporting states?

Open borders with the world pose grave dangers to the United States. The San Diego Union described the chaos on our borders this way: “Every night, the understaffed and outnumbered Border Patrol engaged in a losing battle of cat-and-mouse with thousands of illegal immigrants being led by ruthless smugglers. ... San Ysidro residents locked themselves in at night as smugglers and immigrants traipsed through their yards. Caches of drugs were carried across the border by smugglers and the people they were leading. Hundreds of illegal immigrants lingered in the median strip of Interstate 5 waiting for rides northward. Immigrants running across freeways were hit and killed by motorists.”

A USA columnist visited the border to examine the prospects for a fence. She wrote, “The carnage makes one wonder why environmental groups aren’t out lobbying for a sturdy border fence – instead of arguing against tougher border enforcement.”

My grandfather once said, “Good fences make good neighbors.” Our sovereignty is not divisible. The State of Arizona recognizes that elementary truth. More and more Americans do as well. Too many others do not. There is now hope that, too, will change. Arizona has led the way.

Thursday, May 27, 2010


A chilling report from the Foreign Military Intelligence Directorate (GRU) prepared for Prime Minister Putin warns today that United States President Barack Obama has had served on 14 US Governors National Security Letters (NSLs) warning that if their actions in attempting to form what are called State Defense Forces are not halted they will face "immediate" arrest for the crime of treason.

The use of NSLs in the United States was authorized by the Patriot Act law enacted after the September 11, 2001 attacks and forbids anyone receiving them from even acknowledging their existence, and was reauthorized by Obama's "rubberstamp" Congress this past February over the objections of both civil and human rights groups who warned they mimic similar type "government security notices" enacted under both the former German Nazi and Soviet Communist regimes.

To the issue angering Obama against these State Governors, this report continues, is their attempt to reestablish what are called State Defense Forces which are described as follows:

"State Defense Forces (SDF) (also known as State Guards, State Military Reserves, or State Militias) in the United States are military units that operate under the sole authority of a state government; they are not regulated by the National Guard Bureau nor are they part of the Army National Guard of the United States.

State Defense Forces are authorized by state and federal law and are under the command of the governor of each state. State Defense Forces are distinct from their state's National Guard in that they cannot become federal entities.

The federal government recognizes State Defense Forces under 32 U.S.C. § 109 which provides that State Defense Forces as a whole may not be called, ordered, or drafted into the Armed Forces of the United States, thus preserving their separation from the National Guard."

Important to note is that Obama, as President of the United States is also its most powerful military leader known by the term of Commander in Chief, and is authorized by the Militia Act of 1903 to federalize his individual States National Guard Forces putting them under his command, something he does not have the power to do with State Defense Forces.

Obama's fear of these State Defense Forces, this report says, rests with his not having power over them, and with the bulk of the US Military Forces he does control being stretched to near breaking with the ongoing wars in Iraq and Afghanistan would leave these State military forces under the control of these Governors in "defacto control" of the United States.

The two US Governors spearheading this rebellion against Obama, this report states, are the Republican opposition party Governors of Minnesota, Tim Pawlenty and Texas, Rick Perry; both of whom have a deep fear their President is destroying their Nation.

Governor Pawlenty's fear of Obama is that since he took office he has appeased America's enemies while at the same time shunning some of America's most stalwart allies, especially Israel. Governor Pawlenty recently castigated Obama for abandoning the US missile defense plan for Europe by saying, "The lessons of history are clear: Appeasement and weakness did not stop the Nazis, did not stop the Soviets, and did not stop the terrorists before 9/11. We must stand strong with allies like Israel and eastern Europe in the face of growing challenges to our national security."

Governor Perry has blasted Obama and warned his fellow Texans that the President is "hell bent on socialism" and is punishing his State by dumping tens-of-thousands of illegal Mexican immigrants into their cities and small towns. Governor Perry further warned Texans that that if "Barack Obama's Washington doesn't stop being so oppressive, Texans might feel compelled to renounce their American citizenry and secede from the union."

Note: Following the end of the Civil War the rights of the individual US States to succeed from the Union was heard by their Supreme Court in a case called Texas v. White (1869) and who ruled that the Constitution did not permit States to secede from the United States, and that the ordinances of secession, and all the acts of the legislatures within seceding States intended to give effect to such ordinances, were "absolutely null". However, the decision did allow some possibility of divisibility "through revolution, or through consent of the States."

Obama, in fearing a revolution against him by the States, this report continues, has moved swiftly against them, including nationalizing nearly all National Guard Forces in Governor Pawlenty's Minnesota in what is being described as their State's largest call up of troops since World War II. Other reports coming from the United States are stating that Obama has also nationalized the National Guard forces in Georgia, Alabama, Kansas, and perhaps Texas too.

Though Obama may have taken from these dissident States their National Guard forces, the Governors of the States of Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia still have under their sole command their State Defense Forces to go against US Federal forces.

Important to note in this report is its stating that there are no US laws prohibiting National Guard troops from also joining their State's Defense Forces, but would create a dilemma for those soldiers should they be called to service by them both at the same time. This dilemma occurred for many American soldiers during their Civil War with the great majority of them choosing to serve their States instead of the Federal Government.

To Governor Pawlenty's fears of Obama appeasing America's enemies, while at the same time harming its longstanding allies, their remains no doubt as during this past week alone he has put Israel's security in grave danger by releasing previously classified US documents relating to their nuclear programme, while at the same time removing sanctions on Russian arms makers supplying Iran. And in a move that even Russian military analysts are calling "insane", Obama this week said he has decided to pre-announce to the World once-secret American ballistic missile tests and satellite launches.

To Governor Perry's fears of Obama socializing the United States their remains no doubt either, and as we can read as reported yesterday by the USA Today News Service:

"Paychecks from private business shrank to their smallest share of personal income in U.S. history during the first quarter of this year, a USA TODAY analysis of government data finds.

At the same time, government-provided benefits — from Social Security, unemployment insurance, food stamps and other programs — rose to a record high during the first three months of 2010.

Those records reflect a long-term trend accelerated by the recession and the federal stimulus program to counteract the downturn. The result is a major shift in the source of personal income from private wages to government programs."

And in an even worse move against his own people who are still struggling to survive the growing Global economic collapse, new reports from the United States are stating that a "secret" programme found hidden in Obama's socialist healthcare law called the Community Living Assistance Services and Support Act (CLASS Act) is about to take from them another $150-$250 a month from their paychecks forcing tens of millions more of them into abject poverty and debt slavery.

To the final outcome of these events it is not in our knowing, other than to remind these Americans of Dr. Igor Panarin's 2008 prediction of the fate lying in store for them, and as we can read as reported by London's Telegraph News Service in their article titled "US will collapse and break up, Russian analyst predicts", and which says:

"Igor Panarin, a professor at the Diplomatic Academy of the Russian foreign affairs ministry, said the economic turmoil in the US had confirmed his long-held belief that the country was heading for extinction in its present form.

In an interview with the Russian newspaper Izvestia, he outlined how the US would divide along ethnic and cultural lines.

They are: the Pacific coast with its growing Chinese population; the increasingly Hispanic South; independence-minded Texas; the Atlantic Coast; a central state with a large Native American population; and the northern states where - he maintains - Canadian influence is strong.

Alaska could be claimed by Russia, he said, claiming that the region was "only granted on lease, after all".

He said the country's break-up would be accelerated by rising unemployment and Americans losing their savings.

"The dollar isn't secured by anything. The country's foreign debt has grown like an avalanche; this is a pyramid, which has to collapse," said Prof Panarin."

And to those Americans believing they will be able to defend themselves against the fast approaching onslaught meant to destroy them they should think again, for even as these words are being written, Obama, through the United Nations, is preparing to disarm them all under the so called UN Treaty On Arms Control that he ordered his government to sign.

The late great American dissident comedian George Carlin once said, "It's called the American Dream because you have to be asleep to believe it"….one can only hope these poor souls will awaken from their long slumber before all is lost.

Monday, May 10, 2010


So as not to be outdone by the Clinton Administration, The Obama seems bent upon creating a Waco-type incident that will allow him to bring down his opposition and firmly establish his Marxist regime and his increasingly anti-human policies. In fact the most recent 2010 Allstate/National Journal Heartland Monitor poll showed that only 39% of voters would vote for Obama again. But, as if our votes or lack thereof don't really matter to him, Obama keeps on smiling. It's what all dictators who know they have their boots (or jack-boots) on the throats of the people do and have always done.

However, something else is brewing in the Obama bag-o-tricks. Something that seems almost destined to be used by the tyrant as a sword against all of us--either just before or just after his henchmen (the Obama National Civilian Security Corps--remember them?) have disarmed We-the-People. And something is not right in Monroe County, TN. Something is not right at all.

For those of you who have followed patriot LTC Walter Fitzpatrick's unceasing work to expose Obama's ineligibility to hold the US presidency--or for Obama to at least prove that he IS eligible--the following will come as no surprise. For others, however, it will. But, if you haven't heard about the most recent happenings, both groups need to be prepared to be shocked by what is occurring in Tennessee. It appears to be nothing less than the Obama-selected Ground Zero for his declaration of all-out war against US citizens. Note: Illegal aliens, drug cartels and other criminals need not be concerned.

As LTC Fitzpatrick and Darren Huff (who went to Monroe County with the expressed purpose of supporting Fitzpatrick) are currently under court order to say nothing about either incident, a friend and colleague of LTC Fitzpatrick--Sergeant of Marines Timothy Joseph Harrington--has agreed to an update interview about the strange schemes going on in Monroe County, TN. Note: As is usual and to be expected, the ObamaMedia (including MSM, print and cable news) is deliberately and with apparent malice falsifying most if not all of the information surrounding these two incidents and the two men involved.

The Interview

Sher: Thanks for taking your time for this interview, Sgt. Harrington. When we talked the other day, you described what many of us have thought and written about for awhile now. But, prior to the recent bizarre goings on in Tennessee were never able to effectively offer proof. Now, however, it seems that Monroe County, TN may have been--at least temporarily--picked by the Obama regime to be Ground Zero in his attack against all US citizens who voice opposition to Obama. LTC Walter Fitzpatrick originally went to the Monroe County, TN Courthouse in order to file a complaint of treason against Barack Hussein Obama. It was then that he discovered the illegal operation they had going there, with regards to the Grand Jury. Would you give us a brief background on Walt's efforts?

Tim: Well, as you know, Tennessee and in this county, citizens are allowed to bring information direct to the grand jury under Tennessee law if they have evidence and or knowledge that a crime has been committed. Lt. Com. Fitzpatrick (ret) brought to this grand jury his criminal complaint of "treason" and filled the legal documents and submitted them to the clerk (Martha Cook) for a hearing in front of the Monroe grand jury.

This included his original statement and complaint that was delivered towards the end of August of 2009. Lt. Com. Fitzpatrick's first encounter with Gary Pettway and Asst. District Attorney, Stutz was on or about September 3rd of 2009. This was to be the first time he was to meet with the grand jury. At this point he was obstructed by Stutz and made to rewrite his statement twice before being allowed to go into the grand jury (the Asst. Prosecutor has no authority to demand he change any thing) When he was allowed to go into the grand jury there were only three (3) member and the foreman, This is not makes up the grand jury.

With these things we knew to be wrong, we started looking into the grand jury and the county Judiciary. We knew the obstruction was purposeful but needed to know why. We found out that Gary Pettway had been in place in the grand jury as foreman for at this point over twenty-seven years! Not only had he been the jury foreman for twenty seven years, but he is the grand jury foreman for two (2) standing grand jury's as they pick two (2) for one year terms!

This is completely contradictory to Tennessee Law and the Rules of Procedure under rule six (6) of the Tennessee Rules of Procedure. With the knowledge of these events and with the effort put forth by Mr. Fitzpatrick to go to Judge Reed Dixon and ask for his interaction and help. Judge Dixon refused to do so and said it would be a conflict of interest; not because he is the sessions judge in this jurisdiction but because he and Asst. District Attorney Stutz were friend and former law partners. By the way. Mr. Stutz is also the former Mayor and he and Pettway serve or have served on county boards together. This started Mr. Fitzpatrick going to all other state and federal authorities to look for help. All state and federal authority's said was they have no jurisdiction over the other.

All this is documented and timelines that you now have. This also started the face to face meeting with the Chief of Police, asking for help to make a citizenfs arrest and to make this criminal court public. This also went with no response and all that was left to do, under the laws and protections of the state of Tennessee, was a citizenfs arrest. All parties knew this was to happen and it was announced on the 1st of April and announced in the clerks office on video prior to the event.

People seem to think this is a "Birther Issue." It is not. The Treason complaint is self explanatory and is a Constitutional issue. The issues in the courts and law enforcement in Monroe County reflect an ongoing criminal enterprise; now being endorsed and covered up by the U.S. government agencies.

Note: People who have been notified of the problems in Monroe County: J. Allan Watson ( Monroe County mayor) Martha M. Cook (Circuit Court Clerk) Judge Ross, Sheriff, Police and Police chief, FBI, TBI (Tennessee Bureau of Investigations) DOJ ( Department of Justice) Tennessee Atty. General, Meetings at the State house with Representatives, Congressman Dunkin from the 2nd District.

No one would act on the truth about Monroe County and the ongoing criminality in the Judiciary or the Police organizations. Now, the Federal Government helps suppress the information with arrest and media coverage. Why? My guess the criminal complaint. It is not a Civil action, it must be brought forward and now you have corruption that cannot come out. Now that Mr. Fitzpatrick has gone to his hearing the same judge (Reed Dixon) in sessions court, who is involved in this mess, has decided Mr. Fitzpatrick did commit the crime of inciting a riot and has now given it to the Monroe County Grand Jury who this month is still run by Gary Pettway???? Welcome to Mayberry with the federal government intervention.

Sher: Although they are each former military, both LTC Fitzpatrick and Darren Huff have been painted by the ObamaMedia as being lunatics, extremists and evil militia members. It now appears that anyone who insists that the US Constitution be upheld and followed will be illegally arrested by this current regime.

Actually, I understand that Darren Huff is a member and Chaplain of the Georgia militia which is sanctioned by both the Governor and the State of Georgia. I also understand that Huff was not pulled over by police--or was it the FBI--for any traffic offense but, because he had an Oath Keepers placard on the side of his car. Are both of these assumptions on my part correct? Please fill us in on what really happened.

Tim: You are correct. He was pulled over for supposedly making a rolling stop at the stop sign. This was not the case as he was well aware of the officers behind him. The video shows the five (5) vehicles that were behind Mr. Huff. Mr. Huff was visited the night before April 19, 2010 by the FBI at his home in Georgia. He was asked what his intentions were at this time as to the court date in Monroe county the next morning of April 20, 2010.

He told the truth. He and others were going to Monroe county in support and show of support of Lt. Com. Fitzpatrick after his arrest that took place on the 1st of April. He was asked if he would be going with his side arm and he assured the agent he intended to do so as it was perfectly legal under Georgia and Tennessee law. We have learned that at that point through FBI information given to media he was deemed a threat the night of the 19th.

So, also we have learned through FBI information given to media that he was watched the night of the 19th of April and reported they watched him leave his home the morning of the 20th of April at or around 6:15 am. The stop took place getting off the Highway in Tennessee. Now in this stop he was asked and disarmed from his pistol and it was retained by those officers. He was asked if they could search his truck and he refused citing his 4th amendment rights. He did give full disclosure that there was a rifle in his truck with over 300 hundred rounds under lock and key. They then bought dogs around the truck and found nothing.

This is where people can start connecting the dots. The officers then gave Mr. Huff written warnings and gave his weapon back and let him continue on to Monroe and the court house. In Monroe county there were over 200 law enforcement. There were State, Local, SWAT, and Federally armed Law enforcement waiting for a supposed armed take over of a town and court house for a man that was going for bond review on (4) Misdemeanor from the Citizens arrest on the 1st of April.

If you review the Affidavit of the arrest warrant of the FBI displayed on the JAG Hunter you will see it is dated for the twenty sixth (26) of April. If the FBI deemed him a threat on April 19, 2010 and stopped him with weapons as a supposed threat in Monroe on the 20th of the month and then let him continue on, the arrest warrant only makes sense if, in fact, they were hoping and putting the Monroe Citizenry at risk for an event or to create a event that could be used to back the Government and media warnings. The problem is there was never any intention to my knowledge to ever have anything but a peaceful and supportive gathering on behalf of Mr. Fitzpatrick at his hearing after the criminal events by the county authority's on the first.

If in fact there was confrontation and folks got hurt, all other facts and coverage would go away. What has been uncovered in the Judiciary and the town is the fact that they [hoped] could bolster the stand the government has taken on right wing extremists and add to that the continued story of the uprising of Militias connected to Tea Party events. This was neither. I do not believe for one minute the Oath keepers stickers on the trucks made any difference.

They had plenty of time to stop a supposed threat. What was planned was more sinister. Mr. Huff was finally arrested and charged with crossing state lines with the intent of creating a riot and crossing state lines to create civil un-rest with a weapon under the Commerce laws.

When Mr. Huff was arrested in Tennessee he was visiting other county police and sheriffs asking for help and intervention in Monroe by them. Upon his release, by the FBI, his vehicle was impounded and was the FBI--who paid the fees of the impound so he could drive through Tennessee back to Georgia to get home.

Sher: After Huff was pulled over, they took his registered and legal to carry .45 caliber pistol from him and asked whether or not they could search his vehicle. Darren held to his 4th Amendment rights and said No. When asked if he had any more weapons in the vehicle he openly advised them that he had an AK 47 with ammo. He also advised them that he was on his way to the Monroe County courthouse--on his own--to support LTC Fitzgerald. The authorities let him go. Doesn't this seem to any thinking human being that the Tennessee authorities were letting him go in the hopes that he would go crazy and shoot up the place so that The Obama & Co would have an excuse to come down heavily upon all those who dare to stand up to him and for the US Constitution? Was this supposed to be Obama's Waco?

Tim: I believe it could have been but, for the graces. The excuse was never given nor did the intention to create it by the citizens ever exist. This is the problem they have now. The FBI dates and times make no sense. The interviews on 19 April 2010, the stop on 20 April 20 and the giving back of weapons (if in fact there was a threat) put the potential of innocent citizens at risk. The only explanation is they were looking to make a statement, use it to the governmentfs purposes to uphold the accusation being made daily about people who feel this country is headed in the wrong direction. Stop the only CRIMINAL of TREASON complaint against Obama and hide the governments involvement with this county.

If in fact they let this happen they would be vindicated in their demonizing of the majority of the American public. And all the truths of Monroe county--and the reason Fitzpatrick was in that courtroom--would all go away. Fitzpatrick has been linked to Militia and Right-wing Extremist groups by media as recent as today. See the Las Vegas Sun article Whats common about sense?, add MSNBC and others and you get the picture. Even in this article from Nevada they name no connections and do not even put the name of the columnist.

Tea party folks and all other organizations need to take heed. This is coming to an event near you. The emperor has no clothes.

Sher: Thanks so much, Tim. I think we can agree that the United States of America is in a more desperate situation surrounding its survival than at any other time in history. And its destruction is coming from within and the highest levels of power in our country.

Lt. Col. Lakin, and Commander Fitz:

Darren Huff arrested for supporting LTC Fitzpatrick:

What's common about sense?: /

Saturday, May 08, 2010


While the photo below shows Theodore Roosevelt expounding on being an American (legal) immigrant, the Lame Stream (left leaning) Media had this comment on TV in opposition to Arizona's SB1070!

"Papers please!" The Arizon law makes it "illegal to be an illegal alien!"

Say what?

The law which incorporates Federal Law and language into Arizona State law to make it a misdemeanor to be an illegal alien inside Arizona - as it is under Federal law anywhere in the USA, receives the above type of sloppy "wet kiss" comment from "blame America first" media and TV personalities!

It IS illegal to be an illegal and is no more of a discrimination than saying "illegal murder is illegal in Arizona" and implementing laws against murder!

What are we thinking these days?

Theodore Roosevelt's ideas on Immigrants and being an AMERICAN in 1907.

'In the first place, we should insist that if the immigrant who comes here in good faith becomes an American and assimilates himself to us, he shall be treated on an exact equality with everyone else, for it is an outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed, or birthplace, or origin.

But this is predicated upon the person's becoming in every facet an American, and nothing but an American...

There can be no divided allegiance here.

ALAN note: Moslems CANNOT provide undivided allegiance in any form nor fashion to any State, country, border, system nor custom as they BELONG to Allah and only to Allah and can ONLY obey Allah and NOT any other entity, creed nor organizations.

Those who pretend otherwise are practising "taghieh"(acceptable lying/dissimulation)  for the benefit of Islam which  keeps them in Allah's good graces but provides their host countries with ZERO assurance of the new immigrant accepting let alone assimilating into that new country.

Any claim to the contrary denies the deep-seated inflexible tenets of Islam and the Koran, which prevent such a departure from the Islamic mindset.

Any man who says he is an American, but something else also, isn't an American at all.

We have room for but one flag, the American flag... We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language.. And we have room for but one sole loyalty and that is a loyalty to the American people.'

Theodore Roosevelt 1907

Every American citizen needs to read this!


Wednesday, May 05, 2010


The special, undeserved, privileged status of Islamic Sharia law that has forced Britain's hand and is working hard to insinuate itself here in America, has taken the first major OFFICIAL rebuff.

The Louisiana legislation also bans application of British law, for two reasons. Jihadists have been using British law to silence written dissent/critcism - even if published in the USA - not in Britain. With Sharia law now a solid parallel legal system in the UK for many Islamic litigations, this shunning of British laws also prevents those sliding surreptitiously into USA litigation.

Some in the USA appear to be waking to the threat Oba-Hussein presents with his bias toward Islam.

By James Gill

Within minutes Monday a legislative committee repudiated both Islamic and British law.

Neither, perhaps, represents an immediate threat to justice in Louisiana, but it was not entirely an alarmist and xenophobic stunt when the committee approved two bills by Rep. Ernest Wooton, R-Belle Chase. Mostly, but not entirely.

One of Wooton’s bills, which provides that no foreign law shall be applied here if it violates a right guaranteed by the American Constitution, is by any rational measure superfluous. But it is not unknown for immigrant litigants to invoke the tenets of Sharia to which, the committee was told, the Maryland courts deferred in a child custody case.

The Louisiana Supreme Court has so far insisted that cases in America are settled according to American law, but the committee figured it was wise to commit future jurists to that sound principle. At least the bill does no harm.

Wooton’s other bill may be largely symbolic too, although it is worth passing just in case. It does not single out the Limeys, but its refusal to enforce foreign defamation judgments that are “repugnant to the public policy of this state” is clearly aimed at them. Other states have passed, or are considering, similar legislation in response to a libel award rendered in London against the American writer Rachel Ehrenfeld.

It must be embarrassing for the British when American legislators lump them together with the avatars of medieval repression, but plenty of them are evidently aware it is fair, at least in the context of libel law. As a general election approaches, all three major parties in the UK promise to reform laws that have created “libel tourism” on the very island where John Milton wrote the book on press freedom, “Areopagitica.” That was in 1644, so it’s about time the government got the hang of it.

Instead the law enables large corporations or deep-pocketed individuals to stifle freedom of expression far beyond the shores of Britain, increasingly so in the Internet age, as Ehrenfeld discovered when her book “Funding Evil” identified Saudi billionaire Khalid bin Mahfouz as a financial supporter of al-Qaida.

bin Mahfouz was not about to sue in this country and not just because he would have had to contend with the First Amendment. He has such an unsavory past that he would probably have been ruled libel-proof in any case. No need to go into detail here. You can take my word for it. He won’t sue me.

Ehrenfeld’s book was not even published in Britain but, since a few copies had made their way there through Amazon, bin Mahfouz was able to play the libel tourist and take advantage of laws that so favor the plaintiff that the burden of proof is on the defendant.

The costs of defending such suits over there is so high that the mere threat of litigation generally suffices to squelch inconvenient opinions if the slightest grounds exist for British jurisdiction.

Thus plaintiffs rush to the British courts on the slightest pretext, as, for instance, when an Icelandic bank took offense to a story in a Danish tabloid.

Ehrenfeld declined to attend the proceedings in London and was ordered to pay a hefty sum by Justice Eady, the bete noire of British liberals. Eady has done much to galvanize the campaign for libel reform by ruling against an English journalist who asserted there was no evidence to support the miraculous curative powers claimed by chiropractors over there. Eady is so off the wall — he required the journalist to prove that the chiropractors had set out to deceive the public — that he was recently overturned on appeal.

But Ehfrenfeld is the cause célèbre for Americans. New York took the lead in refusing to recognize libel awards from the British courts, and all hail to our legislators for joining in to strike a blow for freedom of expression. Maybe they love the press after all.

It won’t matter much if the next parliament does indeed reform the antique libel law. But our legislators are not dumb enough to rely on promises made in election campaigns.