Saturday, October 27, 2012


Take a few minutes to read this --

Finally, the Washington Post and Newsweek speak out about Obama. 

This is timely and tough. As many of you know, the Washington Post and Newsweek have a reputation for being extremely liberal. The fact that their editors saw fit to print the following article about Obama and the one that appears in the latest Newsweek, makes this a truly amazing event, and a news story in and of itself. 

At last, the truth about our President and his agenda are starting to trickle through the “protective wall” built around him by the liberal media.

I Too Have Become Disillusioned

By Matt Patterson (columnist - Washington Post, New York Post, San
Francisco Examiner)

Years from now, historians may regard the 2008 election of Barack
Obama as an inscrutable and disturbing phenomenon, the result of a
baffling breed of mass hysteria akin perhaps to the witch craze of the
Middle Ages. 

How, they will wonder, did a man so devoid of professional accomplishment beguile so many into thinking he could
manage the world's largest economy, direct the world's most powerful
military, execute the world's most consequential job?

Imagine a future historian examining Obama's pre-presidential life:

ushered into and through the Ivy League, despite unremarkable grades
and test scores along the way; 

a cushy non-job as a "community

a brief career as a state legislator devoid of legislative
(and in fact nearly devoid of his attention, so often did
he vote "present"); 

and finally an unaccomplished single term in the United States Senate, the entirety of which was devoted to his presidential ambitions.

He left no academic legacy in academia, authored no signaturelegislation as a legislator. 

And then there is the matter of his troubling associations: the white-hating, America-loathing preacher who for decades served as Obama's "spiritual mentor"; 

a real-life, actual terrorist who served as Obama's colleague and political

 It is easy to imagine a future historian looking at it all and asking: how on Earth was such a man elected president?

Not content to wait for history, the incomparable Norman Podhoretz
addressed the question recently in the Wall Street Journal: To be
sure, no white candidate who had close associations with an outspoken
hater of America like Jeremiah Wright and an unrepentant terrorist
like Bill Ayers, would have lasted a single day. 

But because Mr. Obama was black, and therefore entitled in the eyes of liberal Dom to have hung out with protesters against various American injustices, even if they were a bit extreme, he was given a pass. Let that sink in: 

Obama was given a pass - held to a lower standard - because of the color of his skin.

Podhoretz continues: And in any case, what did such ancient history
matter when he was also so articulate and elegant and (as he himself
had said) "non-threatening," all of which gave him a fighting chance
to become the first black president and thereby to lay the curse of
racism to rest?

Podhoretz puts his finger, I think, on the animating pulse of the
Obama phenomenon - affirmative action. Not in the legal sense, of
course. But certainly in the motivating sentiment behind all
affirmative action laws and regulations, which are designed primarily
to make white people, and especially white liberals, feel good about

Unfortunately, minorities often suffer so that whites can pat
themselves on the back. Liberals routinely admit minorities to schools
for which they are not qualified, yet take no responsibility for the
inevitable poor performance and high drop-out rates which follow.

Liberals don't care if these minority students fail; liberals aren't
around to witness the emotional devastation and deflated self-esteem
resulting from the racist policy that is affirmative action. Yes,
racist. Holding someone to a separate standard merely because of the
color of his skin - that's affirmative action in a nutshell, and if
that isn't racism, then nothing is.

And that is what America did to Obama. True, NARCISSIST Obama himself was never troubled by his lack of achievements, but why would he be? 

As many have noted, Obama was told he was good enough for Columbia despite undistinguished grades at Occidental; he was told he was good enough for the US Senate despite a mediocre record in Illinois ; 

he was told he was good enough to be president despite no record at all in the Senate. All his life, every step of the way, Obama was told he was
good enough for the next step, in spite of ample evidence to the

What could this breed if not the sort of empty narcissism on display
every time Obama speaks? In 2008, many who agreed that he lacked
executive qualifications nonetheless raved about Obama's oratory
skills, intellect, and cool character. Those people - conservatives
included - ought now to be deeply embarrassed.

The man thinks and speaks in the hoariest of clich├ęs, and that's when he has his Teleprompters in front of him; when the prompter is absent he can barely think or speak at all. 

Not one original idea has ever  issued from his mouth - it's all warmed-over Marxism of the kind that has failed over and over again for 100 years.

And what about his character? Obama is constantly blaming anything and
everything else for his troubles. Bush did it; it was bad luck; 
inherited this mess. Remember, he wanted the job, campaigned for the task. It is embarrassing to see a president so willing to advertise his own powerlessness, so comfortable with his own incompetence. But
really, what were we to expect? 

The man has never been responsible for anything, so how do we expect him to act responsibly?

In short: our president is a small-minded man, with neither the temperament nor the intellect to handle his job. 

When you understand that, and only when you understand that, will the current erosion of liberty and prosperity make sense. 

It could not have gone otherwise with such a man in the Oval Office.

Sunday, September 23, 2012


Let me make a broad disclosure: I am not Jewish nor an Israeli BUT I am nevertheless infuriated when in the current state of global affairs and destruction of my American environment by a fervently biased, pro-islam usurper of the Oval Office, who encourages and foments death and destruction by willing Moslems, mostly through the Moslem Brotherhood for his own narcissistic, megalomaniac power grabs and cannot care less for our well-being, I am being dragged into certain perdition.

Obama is the American Ayatollah Khomeini, including using the same Marxist-Islamic mix used to destroy Iran by Khomeini and now by Obama to destroy America!

He is intentionally derelict in his duty  to protect America and American interests as he plans and implements his dream of a Moslem 
caliphate ruling the world with himself  as a prominent part or even pinnacle of the leadership.

Below are links to Israeli articles that should be read to achieve an understanding of what has transpired and is happening to America's only regional ally. Though as far as Obama is concerned with his tunnel vision of self interest, he prefers to meet with comedians like David Letterman, go to Las Vegas and reject a meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, though he did schedule a meeting with the Egyptian leader, Mohammad Morsi,who is an fervent leader of the Moslem Brotherhood and outspoken enemy of Israel.

He may have to  cancel Morsi, too, to try to lose fewer Jewish votes in November

A spontaneous thought for Bernice Lipkin.

Read the last few days of articles at AntiMullah and see where we can complement each others' efforts on a regular basis

As thousands of loyal visitors to our site already know has a similar DAILY post of multiple links (with an occasional skipped day) and interesting graphics, which THINK-ISRAEL  readers can peruse selectively to get insights into American and often Iranian happenings. 

I wonder if adding an ANTIMULLAH link/button on the THINK- ISRAEL web page, would serve to achieve the reverse of what was done here, and may expand the readership for both sites and continue on a reciprocal basis. 

With this caution:  as a strict policy Anti-Mullah accepts NO ADVERTISING and will not publish any commercial, what we post is purely our opinion and for educational purposes.

As you can see we can be very outspoken and do not pull our punches  nor dilute our opinions. As a non-profit, non-commercial site we can retain such freedoms,


Fatah And Hamas. Islam And Islamist. They're All Under Sharia
Founding National Myths: Fabricating Palestinian Historyby David Bukay
The Rhetoric Of Nonsense: Fabricating Palestinian Historyby Alexander H. Joffe
A Case Of Myth-Taken Identityby Tabitha Korol
Understanding Egypt's Sexual Intercourse Lawby James G. Zumwalt
Dangerous Illusions About Islamismby Robert R. Reilly
Is There Any Valid Space For Jihad In The Modern World?by Babu Suseelan
Sharia's Stealth Invasion
Swing Low Sweet Shariaby Nidra Poller
Studying Antisemitism On Campusby Phyllis Chesler
Dr. Jasser's Panglossian Koranic Glossby Andrew G. Bostom
Muslim Brotherhood
The Brotherhood's Useful Idiotsby Caroline B. Glick
The Muslim Brotherhood In The Arab World And Islamic Communities In Western Europeby Meir Amit Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
Osama Bin Laden On The Muslim Brotherhoodby Thomas Joscelyn
The Muslim Brotherhood In America: A Video Courseby Mark Tapson
Middle East Dissolution
The Horror And The Pitaby Spengler
Egypt Gaza Powderkegby Yaakov Lappin
Iran And Obama's Syria Hesitation by John Bolton
Forget Syria - Neutralize Iranby David P. Goldman
Winds Of War?by David Meir-Levi
New Beginning by Al Skudsi Bin Hookah
Jew-Hatred In Norwayby Bruce Bawer
The Last Days Of Jews In The Islamicized Europe by Giulio Meotti
German Cartoon Riots: Clubs, Bottles And Stones"by Soeren Kern
Don't Let America Imitate A Burning European Unionby Bruce Thornton
The Dark Side Of Paradiseby Fjordman
Muslim Voters Change Europeby Soeren Kern
It Is Time For The European Multiculturalism Worm To Turn At Lastby Babs Barron
Some Of Israel's Acute Problems Aside From Iran
'Haaretz' Versus The Jewsby Martin Sherman
How To Write About Israelby Daniel Greenfield
Before We Lose Controlby Guy Bechor
Israel's Peace Diseaseby Daniel Greenfield
Stupidity — On Steroidsby Martin Sherman
The Rule Of Lawby Paul Eidelberg
Israel @ 100 -- A Look Ahead BY Brandon Marlon
Pr-Ti: Plain Rotten To Israel
Can Left-Wing Journalists Really Be Fair? by Fjordman
'Political Correctness' Is Totalitarian Mind Controlby David Kupelian
Whitewash Of Sharia Climbs The Bestseller Listsby Bruce Bawer
More Shameful BBC Propaganda Against Israelby Robin Shepherd
History Section
FDR Used The Jewsby Rafael Medoff
Passengers On A Ship Turned Back From Its Journey: 64 Years Later, Exodus Survivors Meet For Lunchby Sherry Gavanditti
The "Iasi" Pogrom: A Solemn Jewish Anniversaryby Jerrold L. Sobel
The Truth About The Nakbaby Robert Werdine
A Different History Of Displacement And Lossby Matti Friedman
The Blog-Ed pages for May and June are not yet available.
We provide direct links to websites that supply accurate background information and news relating to Israel.

Do look at the web site.

And please, if you have a blog-ed piece or a comment or commentary, contact us. Write to or to

Pieces for THINK-ISRAEL should be informative and accurate. Fortunately, those of us who are pro-Israel can show our love of Israel without distorting the truth. We don't need to play by the rules laid down by the Arab-favoring media, which distort the news and omit important items of information.

Bernice Lipkin
Editor, Think-Israel

Saturday, September 15, 2012


Breaking news: Obama challenge with a perfect standing and the most comprehensive challenge with 14 causes of action, 30 defendants (among them representatives of the media) 109 pp of pleadings and 154 pages of exhibits were filed today

Posted on | September 10, 2012 |

A challenger with the most perfect standing is represented by Attorney Orly Taitz. Keith Judd ran against Barack Obama in W.V. and got 40% in the Democratic party primary. 

Today Attorney Orly Taitz filed a legal challenge to Obama on behalf of Keith Judd, who has a perfect standing, as do a number of other parties.

This is the most comprehensive elections challenge to date with 109 pages of pleadings and 154 exhibits, 30 defendants, 14 causes of action

A number of media networks and news men were named as defendants as well in causes of action for defamation and Racketeering scheme to defraud the Plaintiffs and to defraud the nation and aid and abet Obama to get on the ballot with forged IDs and a stolen SSN. 

Among media networks (defendants) are: CNN, MSNBC, Clear Channel and others.

Monday, September 03, 2012


August 22, 2012

What if, during the gathering-storm decade of the 1930s, a senior White House aide in the Franklin D. Roosevelt administration had been found to have taken big money from a company dealing closely with the Nazis? Would it would have been a huge scandal? Of course it would.

And what if, during the Cold War '40s, a top White House aide to President Harry Truman had been caught taking cash from a company dealing with the Soviets? The question answers itself.

But now, in 2012, a White House aide in the Obama administration is revealed to have received a six-figure amount from a company connected to Iran, and nothing happens. 

The press doesn’t seem to care; the establishment is unruffled; even opposition Republicans have hardly noticed. 

If we, as a nation, had been this un-vigilant back during '30s or the '40s, America might not have survived.

More than two weeks after it ran, we can see now what should have been a big bang of a news story -- the August 5 report in the Washington Post that David Plouffe, White House senior adviser, had accepted $100,000 from MTN, a South Africa-based mobile-phone company--a company that does multi-billion dollar business with Iran. Yet the story has, in fact, turned out to be a whimper.

At Monday’s White House press conference -- the first such Q and A session in eight weeks -- the press found time to ask questions about Syria, Afghanistan, and, of course, Mitt Romney’s taxes and Todd Akins’s idiotic words. 

Legitimate questions all, but the juiciest potential news story was Plouffe and his money; after all, here was the chance for a brave reporter to ask the President, face to face, why one of his closest aides had taken money, indirectly, from Iran. And yet none of the questioners seized the moment. 

So who, exactly, is David Plouffe? 

He is a longtime Democratic political operative, perhaps second only to David Axelrod in the Obama political world; Plouffe was campaign manager for the 2008 Obama campaign, while Axelrod was chief strategist.

Remaining in the private sector after Obama’s victory, Plouffe published in 2010 a partisan and hallowing book about Obama, The Audacity to Win: How Obama Won and How We Can Beat the Party of Limbaugh, Beck, and Palin.

In addition, Plouffe did what many others, in both parties, have done after a big political win; he cashed in on the speaking circuit. One of those speeches caused him quick grief; it was reported in February 2009 that he had taken $50,000 to speak in the repressive ex-Soviet state of Azerbaijan; the backlash from human rights activists forced him to donate the money to a pro-democracy group.

Given that precedent, it’s all the more remarkable that nobody in the media has made a stink about Plouffe taking twice as much money from MTN, a $15 billion-a-year mobile phone company, for a speaking gig to MTN executives in Lagos, Nigeria in December 2010. 

One of the firm’s assets is MTN Irancell, which is Iran’s second-largest mobile operator. Indeed, according to the Wall Street Journal, MTN Irancell accounts for more than a fifth of MTN subscribers worldwide.

For its part, an MTN spokesman told the Post in its August 5 story that Plouffe was engaged “because of his expertise and his knowledge of the U.S. political scene.” But importantly, the speaking gig came three weeks after it was announced that Plouffe would be joining the White House staff. 

In other words, MTN wasn’t just paying to schmooze with a well-connected political insider; it was paying to schmooze with a future senior White House aide, someone who would have close access to the President and to national security secrets.

And while the same Post article added that the White House assured that Plouffe held no private meetings with MTN executives on his speaking trip, the questions of how one defines “private meeting” and whether or not Plouffe held meetings with MTN executives elsewhere seem not to have come up.

Yet one activist group, United Against Nuclear Iran, (UANI) doesn’t seem to buy these attempted soothings. UANI has been campaigning for sanctions against MTN for three years. The group issued a statement on August 6, the day after the Post story, noting MTN Irancell’s subservience to the Iranian government, adding that it was especially egregious when Irancell shut down phone service to dissidents during the 2009-10 “Green Revolution.” 

Declared UANI: “MTN has blood on its hands.”

Pointing its finger at the White House aide, UANI's statement continued, “We hope Mr. Plouffe will use his considerable influences to urge President Obama to sanction MTN and most important enact a full economic blockade on Iran, so that companies will no longer be able to operate there.” 

And UANI offered model language for sanctions which would prohibit the sort of speeches-for-hire that Plouffe had delivered.

That same day, August 6, the Washington Post’s rogue conservative blogger, Jennifer Rubin, got right down to it when she asked why Plouffe still had a job:

Why hasn’t the president fired David Plouffe who “accepted a $100,000 speaking fee in 2010 from an affiliate of a company doing business with Iran’s government”? How can the president tell other countries not to do business with the regime if a senior adviser has?

Yes, those are good questions, going right to the heart of not only ethics in the White House, but also US national security policy around the world. But nobody else asked them.

Instead, the following day, August 7, the New York Times ran a complicated story on the Plouffe matter, in which White House aides managed to work Mitt Romney into the narrative, arguing that he was an investor in a rival phone company, Turkcell, that competed against MTN for the Iran business -- so Romney stood to gain if MTN were sanctioned. 

In other words, the White House was saying, whatever an Obama aide might have done indirectly with Iran, Romney could be doing it even worse.
In fact, it appears that the Times story, including the Turkcell pushback, was enough to convince the Romney campaign not to engage on the Plouffe issue. 

And perhaps the Romney campaign’s non-engagement was enough, also, to wave away most of the conservative media. And for its part, the MSM wasn’t much interested.

But the rest of us should be interested -- a lot. No matter where the chips fall.

Iran has been a sworn enemy of the United States since 1979

The Islamic Republic was held legally responsible by a US court for the deaths of 17 Americans at the 1996 Khobar Towers bombing in Saudi Arabia. And US officials have accused Iran of supplying weapons to anti-American forces in both Iraq and Afghanistan

Moreover, Iran has been credibly linked to various anti-Israeli terrorist attacks from Argentina to India -- which should be no surprise, since Iranian leaders, long before Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, have long called for the annihilation of Israel. From an American strategic point of view, it’s hard to get much worse than that. 

And in fact, according to a 2012 Gallup survey, Americans agree that Iran is America’s number one enemy.

In the Plouffe case, the press has had a huge opportunity to speak some strong truth to corrupt, reckless -- and, yes, dangerous -- power. 

That is, reporters could now be connecting the dots from Washington, DC to Johannesburg to Lagos -- and maybe from there to Tehran. Some enterprising journo could be sleuthing out the paymasters and the interlocutors, threshing out witnesses, documents, and maybe even a Deep Throat. 

And he or she could be revealing a huge international scandal -- far bigger than the domestic Watergate -- that would not only be disrupting US politics but also reverberate through history, like the XYZ Affair, the Alger Hiss spy case, or the Iran-Contra fiasco.

Promotions, Pulitzers, and publishing contracts await whoever cracks this story -- maybe even a big Hollywood movie deal. Or maybe not. Because, after all, such scandal-sleuthing would come at the expense of a Democratic President. The One. So which reporter -- among all the reporters whom Politico once called “Obama’s secret weapon” -- wants to have that on his or her conscience? So far, none -- and certainly none of the reporters who asked questions of the President on Monday. 

They all seem more interested in protecting their access to the White House and their special relationships with staffers than in doing their jobs.

Yet because the stakes are so high, we must regard them not just as lapdogs but as enablers of a significant national security risk to the nation.

But can it really be that simple? Can it really be that reporters will forgo a great story for partisan purposes? Or for ideological affinity? Or for personal adulation?

Well, we have seen the same pro-Obama lack of curiosity before. Earlier this year, as a cascade of leaks about sensitive topics -- the use of the Stuxnet virus against Iran and anti-terror tactics in Pakistan and Yemen, including the death of Bin Laden, among others -- came gushing from the White House. 

The reason for these leaks was plainly to help burnish Obama’s national security credentials in time for his re-election campaign -- a campaign that seems to have a second campaign manager in the form of national security adviser Tom Donilon.

To Donilon, and perhaps others around the Oval Office, the safety of our troops seems to be less important than four more years for their man. Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), the chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, was blunt about the whole business: The leaking, she declared on June 6, has been “very, very disturbing… 

It’s dismayed our allies. It puts American lives in jeopardy. It puts our nation’s security in jeopardy.” A few weeks later, she added, “I think the White House has to understand that some of this is coming from their ranks.” After a fierce reaction inside the Democratic Party, Feinstein recanted her charge against the White House, although not the assertion that the leaks were harmful.

For its part, the press has not been particularly interested in this story, either. A few favored reporters got their hot scoops while the rest of the press corps looked on coolly, getting more excited over Mitt Romney’s old taxes than over the future safety of the nation.

This media-disinterest phenomenon is so staggering -- and so dangerous -- that it requires further examination. We’ll take up this issue further in the next installment.

Monday, June 18, 2012


Here are the top trending stories for the beginning of this week:

In Obama Ethics:  The lead story is also featured on the Drudge Report: An attempt to stifle information at Google, followed closely by the administration's white washing of their attempt to give us the Dream Act by decree.

In the Gunwalker Scandal, Holder is squirming, trying to reach a "Hudna" with Issa over his pending Contempt of Congress citation but is also getting lawsuits from Judicial Watch, and badmouthed by the Border Patrol itself.  I posted a Sipsey Street story last night about another revelation over Obama advisor Denis McDonough being up to his eyeballs in the Gunwalker affair.

The president of Mexico was well pleased with Obama-amnesty and sent El Presidente Hussein his personal thanks, while the former advisor to the _resident thinks he should apologize for dividing the country.

Obamsky's foreign policy skill remains unmatched by mere mortals as the Muslim Brotherhood consolidated its gains in Egypt and launched its first attack from Egypt on Israel from the Egyptian side of the Sinai since Egyptian accord with Israel.  Then moved tanks closer to the fence in the Sinai.  Peace is bustin' out all over.

Queen Michelle is on the campaign trail EVERYWHERE.  The links are below, and the site.

That is what is hot (or not) at the moment.  The website has all the links not covered here.  I will post more as the day progresses.

Thanks for your support!


Obama Ethics: Year 4


Community Organizer to the World

Obama and Egypt
Obama and Israel
Queen Michelle

Hat tip Nachum

Thursday, May 24, 2012


Dear Mr. Benett,

I just received your e-mail sent to my supporter, Netty. My name is Orly Taitz.

I am an attorney, who is challenging Barack Obama in several states and came very close to removing him from the ballot in the state of GA during primary, I will renew my challenge in the general election there and I brought challenges in other states. In MS and IN the legal challenges include Secretaries of States. I am placing you on notice of flagrant forgery in Barack Obama’s birth certificate, selective service certificate and his fraudulent use of CT Social Security number 042-68-4425, which was never assigned to him according to e-verify.

As a Secretary of state you are in charge of assuring lawful elections, free of fraud. If, while possessing this knowledge of fraud and forgery , you allow Mr. Obama on the ballot, you are at the very minimum violating your fiduciary duty as a Secretary of State in failing to assure lawful elections, at the maximum you are criminally complicit.

If someone in the city hall would be complicit with a forger, who claimed that your house is actually his house, would you be satisfied in having the same corrupt bureaucrat sending you a note, saying that he has a deed somewhere saying that your house belongs to the forger?

Would you just move out of your house and give the keys to the criminal? Of course not. You would consider that to be a complete idiocy.

You would demand the crook at the city hall to show the original deed, and if he does not provide an original deed, you would sue him together with the forger in RICO, as it would be racketeering and collusion between the forger and a paid governmental employee.

The same thing is going on here. We have a criminal, Barack Hussein Obama, unlawfully occupying the White House and attempting to get on the ballot and extend his tenure for 4 more years, while using a forged birth certificate, forged selective service certificate and a stolen Social Security number.

Two detectives from Maricopa County sheriffs department flew to HI, appeared in the Health Department, demanded to see the original birth certificate and were denied access.

Coupled with evidence of forgery in the alleged copy, this provides for a probable cause to believe that what they have, is the same computer generated forgery, not a genuine birth certificate, created in 1961. Every Secretary of State has fraud investigators.

I am sure you have one as well. In light of all of the above it is your fiduciary duty to send a fraud investigator and a forensic document expert to the Health Department of HI and demand access to the alleged original document for expert examination.

If you do not do that in light of all the evidence, you are violating your fiduciary duty at best or complicit at worst.

I trust that you will not breach your fiduciary duty and will send a fraud investigator and a forensic document expert to HI.

Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ

SOME  COMMENTS (May 24th) :

1. Bennett sold out. Anyone with an ounce of common sense can see he got nothing. He played (or sold out) to the left and the media’s hand.

2. Dr. Taitz, Esq.,
After reviewing an uproarious response I have conclude the following:
You have no problems in communicating a point.
You hold people responsible & accountable.
Your facts, logic, strategic, and debating excellent.
You maybe the only Lawyer I respect presently!
Your commitment to the US Constitution and our legal system shines brightly from your courage!
As a Democrat you have my respect, but as an American I must say a job well done & God Bless you!

3. This needs to be sent to every Secretary of State. We need to hold them all accountable.

4. Mr Bennet did not cave in. He has done as several judges or other law officials have done to spare themselves and their families of the threat of death that Obama and the democrast as well as republicans are bringing upon we the people.

5. This situation with Obama is an abomination on the intentions and words of the Founding Fathers. There is something very mysterious about what and who are Obama’s enablers. 

On one side of the stage I see the Chicago and Hawaii scenarios. 

These are local communists following long practiced plots for ‘change’. 

On the other side of the stage I see the internationalists such as Soros and others who are going for Bush1′s new world order. I believe both sides of the stage are working together. 

This is a very powerful/influential cabal which includes prominent politicians from all states for self service/promotion. A very tough nut to crack so to speak. 

It is a marvel that a lady from another such national historical example is needed to show the citizens of the USA the consequences and cause of the folly of ‘change’.

6, So, does SOS Bennett seriously take the following sentence as “proof”?:

“”…..I verify that the INFORMATION in the copy of the Certificate of Live Birth for Mr. Obama that you attached with your request matches the original record in our files.”"

Why are they playing with words??

not how it was entered. It cannot be compared side by side!!

This should be shared and sent to every Secretary of State. The cave in was announced  before Bennet even OPENED the Email he was sent from Hawaii! It no longer mattered WHAT  it said. He was not going to stand firm in the face of threats to his family.

Even Bill and Hillary Clinton folded when their friends were killed to prevent them running against Obama in 2007/08.

Monday, May 14, 2012


The Department of Health and Human Services last week announced it had awarded a $5.9 million grant to a University of Chicago Medical Center program tied to Michelle Obama and run by Eric Whitaker, one of President Obama’s closest friends.

The Urban Health Initiative, which received the award, was originally based on a smaller program launched during the last decade by Michelle Obama, who was an executive at the University of Chicago Medical Center before she departed to become first lady. The UHI is headed up by Obama basketball and golf buddy Whitaker, who has known the president since Obama’s days in law school and who also vacations with the first family.

Obama senior adviser Valerie Jarrett also has ties to the UHI. Until resigning to go work at the White House, Jarrett was Chairman of the University of Chicago Medical Center Board of Trustees. And in 2007, a PR firm run by former senior White House adviser and Obama political guru David Axelrod provided provided public relations strategy advice to the UHI, according to the Washington Post.

There is no specific evidence that any of those linked to the Obamas, or the Obamas themselves, influenced the HHS decision to grant the funding to the UHI. But the large award raises questions about appearance, given the number of Obama associates connected to the program and the involvement of the first lady with its founding.

The UHI won out over lots of competition. According to HHS, some 3,000 applications were received for a share on the $1 billion in 3-year grants available. Only 26 programs were included in the first batch of awards doled out.

An HHS spokesperson said that while “final determinations” were made by the HHS’s CMS Innovation Center Director, objective standards were used in selecting the awards and the White House was not “in any way” involved in the selection of grantees.

“Applications that met the basic eligibility requirements underwent a competitive, objective review,” the spokesperson said. “Independent health care expert review panels from outside government and staff from all across the Department of Health and Human Services reviewed the applications for how well they met the criteria outlined in the grant solicitation, and made recommendations regarding funding . . . scoring was conducted by an independent panel of content experts that was organized by an experienced contractor.”

The awards have been politicized by the administration, which is touting them as part of its “We Can’t Wait” initiative to create jobs by executive action while the White House “waits” for the Republican-led House to act. The Innovation Center was established under Obamacare.

The Urban Health Initiative was founded to help link low-income patients to health providers in their communities.

According to HHS, UHI received the grant to help it, in partnership with other groups, increase patients’ access to health resources by developing an electronic database of health providers that links to electronic health records maintained by “local safety net providers.”

Last week’s award is not the first time money directed toward the UHI has raised red flags. In September, The Daily Caller reported that the private philanthropy of billionaire Obama supporter and donor George Kaiser had donated $10,000 to the UHI during 2009, the same year Kaiser secured the now-infamous $535 million government loan guarantee to failed solar panel maker Solyndra.


Friday, April 27, 2012


With White House directives raining down on them to look away at Moslem terrorism ("the war on terror is over") and Eric Holder of the Department of INjustice and Janet Napolitano of Homeland Security impeding any prosecution of  any anti-America activity, the FBI has sadly been emasculated - if they want to keep their jobs. Just as Clinton emasculated the CIA and FBI.

I have known my share of operatives/agents of both agencies in the past and had a respect for their toughness and dedication. The CIA under Clinton became a bunch of desk jockeys and analysts, who had never been there nor done that in the field, forbidden to talk to the FBI to share information - weakening both. Operationally experienced staff resigned in droves!

Now, with the Moslem Brotherhood running Islamic relations (bias in their own favor out of the White House, all FBI and other law enforcement or military forbidden to train agents that terrorism has links to Islam, Obama has rendered them impotent. This story below gives a good indication of this. This is not intended to tar and feather all agents and operatives but the good ones are having to keep their heads down and their mouths shut. Specially when joint anti-terror task forces are concerned.

While the GSA misuses funds, Michelle Obama takes repeated very EXPENSIVE VACATIONS (for instance about half a million dollars for a brief visit to Spain) or Obama "misuses/steals" tax money to pay for his campaigning, or spending TRILLIONS of our dollars on his weird radical agendas, FBI and CIA budgets or other law enforcement officers charged with investigating crime and terrorism have their budgets cut to the bone!

It's not a big leap to think the destruction of America and our culture and values is part of his plans. Is it not ? Prepare to be dominated by Islamic Sharia if he gets re-elected.

The murder of U.S. Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry in December of 2010 was the precipitating factor that led to the first news story concerning the now infamous Fast and Furious scandal involving the ATF, the DOJ, and their scheme to send American guns to Mexican drug cartels.

As that story has developed it has become clear that the government agencies involved in the scandal, including the FBI, were keenly interested in hiding certain information concerning Agent Terry's death, the most obvious being that one of the guns found at the murder scene was identified by whistleblower agents as a Fast and Furious gun and that this gun somehow mysteriously disappeared and never made it to the lab for analysis.

New information that has become available within the last 24 hours indicates another major reason the FBI in particular sought to keep the facts concerning Agent Terry's death a secret.

According to a major investigative report published on April 21 in the Los Angeles Times, the FBI was able to convince a major Mexican drug cartel kingpin to serve as an informant.

And citizen investigative reporter Mike Vanderboegh stated today that this drug kingpin is the one the FBI was attempting to protect when evidence was hidden in Brian Terry's murder.

Vanderboegh was the one who first broke the Fast and Furious story in December of 2010.

On center stage is one Jesus Audel Miramontes-Varela, a chieftain in the Juarez cartel who reportedly once fed one of his victims to a group of lions. Miramontes-Varela had been arrested by FBI agents in Denver in August of 2010 and provided a wealth of information concerning drug routes, shooting deaths, and mass graves.

Under intense interrogation Miramontes-Varela told agents that he wished to trade his knowledge of cartel activity for government protection. He claimed he wanted a new life for his wife and three children.

Interestingly, the FBI was not the only federal agency interested in Miramontes-Varela. The ATF had identified the kingpin as a major player in the Fast and Furious scandal and wanted him arrested. It was then that the ATF released a dangerous gun trafficker, Fabian Celis-Acosta, in May of 2010 on the basis of the criminal's promise that he would help them nab Miramontes-Varela and his brother.

The Miramontes-Varela brothers had illegally purchased firearms in the amount of $250,000 in the Fast and Furious operation. But that is not their only connection with Fast and Furious.

Politico reported on March 28, 2012 that the FBI failed to notify the ATF that the Miramontes-Varela brothers were paid government informants.

Upon hearing the news of the FBI's deliberate tactic of keeping secret the fact that the Miramontes-Varela brothers were informants, and that Celis-Acosta had been released by the ATF upon the promise that he would help nab the brothers, the family of Brian Terry was livid.

Celis-Acosta was one of the main players in the scheme to place U.S. guns in the hands of the Mexican drug cartels, the very activity that Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry was investigating at the time of his death.

In a statement to Politico in March of this year, the Terry family wrote,

One can only imagine that if the FBI, DEA and U.S. Attorney personnel had only shared their information with ATF agents that the Miramontes brothers were FBI informants, [then] the entire Fast and Furious debacle could have been avoided.

With this single piece of information, ATF could have chosen not to proceed with Operation Fast and Furious, which ultimately put almost 2,000 assault weapons into the hands of some of the most dangerous criminals in North America. Had this simple piece of information been shared among the different federal law enforcement agencies in Arizona, some 200 Mexican citizens would not have had to lose their lives in needless violence and U.S. Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry would still be alive.

And in another pertinent fact concerning this aspect of the case, it was Phoenix ATF Special Agent in Charge Bill Newell who told his agents to back off when they were bearing down on Celis-Acosta and the Miramontes-Varela brothers.