Saturday, September 15, 2012

KEITH JUDD got 40% in West Virginia PRIMARY - CHALLENGES OBAMA ELIGIBILITY

Breaking news: Obama challenge with a perfect standing and the most comprehensive challenge with 14 causes of action, 30 defendants (among them representatives of the media) 109 pp of pleadings and 154 pages of exhibits were filed today

Posted on | September 10, 2012 |

A challenger with the most perfect standing is represented by Attorney Orly Taitz. Keith Judd ran against Barack Obama in W.V. and got 40% in the Democratic party primary.

Today Attorney Orly Taitz filed a legal challenge to Obama on behalf of Keith Judd, who has a perfect standing, as do a number of other parties.

This is the most comprehensive elections challenge to date with 109 pages of pleadings and 154 exhibits, 30 defendants, 14 causes of action.

A number of media networks and news men were named as defendants as well in causes of action for defamation and Racketeering scheme to defraud the Plaintiffs and to defraud the nation and aid and abet Obama to get on the ballot with forged IDs and a stolen SSN.

Among media networks (defendants) are: CNN, MSNBC, Clear Channel and others.

Monday, September 03, 2012

WHITE HOUSE TAKES MONEY FROM IRAN - NOBODY NOTICES

WHITE HOUSE AIDE DAVID PLOUFFE TAKES MONEY INDIRECTLY FROM IRAN -- AND NOBODY SEEMS TO NOTICE

by PATRICK CADDELL

August 22, 2012

What if, during the gathering-storm decade of the 1930s, a senior White House aide in the Franklin D. Roosevelt administration had been found to have taken big money from a company dealing closely with the Nazis? Would it would have been a huge scandal? Of course it would.

And what if, during the Cold War '40s, a top White House aide to President Harry Truman had been caught taking cash from a company dealing with the Soviets? The question answers itself.

But now, in 2012, a White House aide in the Obama administration is revealed to have received a six-figure amount from a company connected to Iran, and nothing happens.

The press doesn’t seem to care; the establishment is unruffled; even opposition Republicans have hardly noticed.

If we, as a nation, had been this un-vigilant back during '30s or the '40s, America might not have survived.

More than two weeks after it ran, we can see now what should have been a big bang of a news story -- the August 5 report in the Washington Post that David Plouffe, White House senior adviser, had accepted $100,000 from MTN, a South Africa-based mobile-phone company--a company that does multi-billion dollar business with Iran. Yet the story has, in fact, turned out to be a whimper.

At Monday’s White House press conference -- the first such Q and A session in eight weeks -- the press found time to ask questions about Syria, Afghanistan, and, of course, Mitt Romney’s taxes and Todd Akins’s idiotic words.

Legitimate questions all, but the juiciest potential news story was Plouffe and his money; after all, here was the chance for a brave reporter to ask the President, face to face, why one of his closest aides had taken money, indirectly, from Iran. And yet none of the questioners seized the moment.

So who, exactly, is David Plouffe?

He is a longtime Democratic political operative, perhaps second only to David Axelrod in the Obama political world; Plouffe was campaign manager for the 2008 Obama campaign, while Axelrod was chief strategist.

Remaining in the private sector after Obama’s victory, Plouffe published in 2010 a partisan and hallowing book about Obama, The Audacity to Win: How Obama Won and How We Can Beat the Party of Limbaugh, Beck, and Palin.

In addition, Plouffe did what many others, in both parties, have done after a big political win; he cashed in on the speaking circuit. One of those speeches caused him quick grief; it was reported in February 2009 that he had taken $50,000 to speak in the repressive ex-Soviet state of Azerbaijan; the backlash from human rights activists forced him to donate the money to a pro-democracy group.

Given that precedent, it’s all the more remarkable that nobody in the media has made a stink about Plouffe taking twice as much money from MTN, a $15 billion-a-year mobile phone company, for a speaking gig to MTN executives in Lagos, Nigeria in December 2010.

One of the firm’s assets is MTN Irancell, which is Iran’s second-largest mobile operator. Indeed, according to the Wall Street Journal, MTN Irancell accounts for more than a fifth of MTN subscribers worldwide.

For its part, an MTN spokesman told the Post in its August 5 story that Plouffe was engaged “because of his expertise and his knowledge of the U.S. political scene.” But importantly, the speaking gig came three weeks after it was announced that Plouffe would be joining the White House staff.

In other words, MTN wasn’t just paying to schmooze with a well-connected political insider; it was paying to schmooze with a future senior White House aide, someone who would have close access to the President and to national security secrets.

And while the same Post article added that the White House assured that Plouffe held no private meetings with MTN executives on his speaking trip, the questions of how one defines “private meeting” and whether or not Plouffe held meetings with MTN executives elsewhere seem not to have come up.

Yet one activist group, United Against Nuclear Iran, (UANI) doesn’t seem to buy these attempted soothings. UANI has been campaigning for sanctions against MTN for three years. The group issued a statement on August 6, the day after the Post story, noting MTN Irancell’s subservience to the Iranian government, adding that it was especially egregious when Irancell shut down phone service to dissidents during the 2009-10 “Green Revolution.”

Declared UANI: “MTN has blood on its hands.”

Pointing its finger at the White House aide, UANI's statement continued, “We hope Mr. Plouffe will use his considerable influences to urge President Obama to sanction MTN and most important enact a full economic blockade on Iran, so that companies will no longer be able to operate there.”

And UANI offered model language for sanctions which would prohibit the sort of speeches-for-hire that Plouffe had delivered.

That same day, August 6, the Washington Post’s rogue conservative blogger, Jennifer Rubin, got right down to it when she asked why Plouffe still had a job:

Why hasn’t the president fired David Plouffe who “accepted a $100,000 speaking fee in 2010 from an affiliate of a company doing business with Iran’s government”? How can the president tell other countries not to do business with the regime if a senior adviser has?

Yes, those are good questions, going right to the heart of not only ethics in the White House, but also US national security policy around the world. But nobody else asked them.

Instead, the following day, August 7, the New York Times ran a complicated story on the Plouffe matter, in which White House aides managed to work Mitt Romney into the narrative, arguing that he was an investor in a rival phone company, Turkcell, that competed against MTN for the Iran business -- so Romney stood to gain if MTN were sanctioned.

In other words, the White House was saying, whatever an Obama aide might have done indirectly with Iran, Romney could be doing it even worse.

In fact, it appears that the Times story, including the Turkcell pushback, was enough to convince the Romney campaign not to engage on the Plouffe issue.

And perhaps the Romney campaign’s non-engagement was enough, also, to wave away most of the conservative media. And for its part, the MSM wasn’t much interested.

But the rest of us should be interested -- a lot. No matter where the chips fall.

Iran has been a sworn enemy of the United States since 1979.

The Islamic Republic was held legally responsible by a US court for the deaths of 17 Americans at the 1996 Khobar Towers bombing in Saudi Arabia. And US officials have accused Iran of supplying weapons to anti-American forces in both Iraq and Afghanistan.

Moreover, Iran has been credibly linked to various anti-Israeli terrorist attacks from Argentina to India -- which should be no surprise, since Iranian leaders, long before Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, have long called for the annihilation of Israel. From an American strategic point of view, it’s hard to get much worse than that.

And in fact, according to a 2012 Gallup survey, Americans agree that Iran is America’s number one enemy.

In the Plouffe case, the press has had a huge opportunity to speak some strong truth to corrupt, reckless -- and, yes, dangerous -- power.

That is, reporters could now be connecting the dots from Washington, DC to Johannesburg to Lagos -- and maybe from there to Tehran. Some enterprising journo could be sleuthing out the paymasters and the interlocutors, threshing out witnesses, documents, and maybe even a Deep Throat.

And he or she could be revealing a huge international scandal -- far bigger than the domestic Watergate -- that would not only be disrupting US politics but also reverberate through history, like the XYZ Affair, the Alger Hiss spy case, or the Iran-Contra fiasco.

Promotions, Pulitzers, and publishing contracts await whoever cracks this story -- maybe even a big Hollywood movie deal. Or maybe not. Because, after all, such scandal-sleuthing would come at the expense of a Democratic President. The One. So which reporter -- among all the reporters whom Politico once called “Obama’s secret weapon” -- wants to have that on his or her conscience? So far, none -- and certainly none of the reporters who asked questions of the President on Monday.

They all seem more interested in protecting their access to the White House and their special relationships with staffers than in doing their jobs.

Yet because the stakes are so high, we must regard them not just as lapdogs but as enablers of a significant national security risk to the nation.

But can it really be that simple? Can it really be that reporters will forgo a great story for partisan purposes? Or for ideological affinity? Or for personal adulation?

Well, we have seen the same pro-Obama lack of curiosity before. Earlier this year, as a cascade of leaks about sensitive topics -- the use of the Stuxnet virus against Iran and anti-terror tactics in Pakistan and Yemen, including the death of Bin Laden, among others -- came gushing from the White House.

The reason for these leaks was plainly to help burnish Obama’s national security credentials in time for his re-election campaign -- a campaign that seems to have a second campaign manager in the form of national security adviser Tom Donilon.

To Donilon, and perhaps others around the Oval Office, the safety of our troops seems to be less important than four more years for their man. Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), the chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, was blunt about the whole business: The leaking, she declared on June 6, has been “very, very disturbing…

It’s dismayed our allies. It puts American lives in jeopardy. It puts our nation’s security in jeopardy.” A few weeks later, she added, “I think the White House has to understand that some of this is coming from their ranks.” After a fierce reaction inside the Democratic Party, Feinstein recanted her charge against the White House, although not the assertion that the leaks were harmful.

For its part, the press has not been particularly interested in this story, either. A few favored reporters got their hot scoops while the rest of the press corps looked on coolly, getting more excited over Mitt Romney’s old taxes than over the future safety of the nation.

This media-disinterest phenomenon is so staggering -- and so dangerous -- that it requires further examination. We’ll take up this issue further in the next installment.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/08/23/david-plouffe-iran

Sunday, July 29, 2012

CHANGE YOUR RELIGION OR CLOSE DOWN YOUR BUSINESS

AUDIO TAPE OF INTERVIEW BY MARK LEVIN

http://podfuse-dl.andomedia.com/800185/podfuse-origin.andomedia.com/citadel_origin/pods/marklevin/Levin07262012.mp3

Monday, June 18, 2012

Thursday, May 24, 2012

ARIZONA SECRETARY OF STATE CAVES IN WITHOUT GETTING PROOF

Dear Mr. Benett,

I just received your e-mail sent to my supporter, Netty. My name is Orly Taitz.

I am an attorney, who is challenging Barack Obama in several states and came very close to removing him from the ballot in the state of GA during primary, I will renew my challenge in the general election there and I brought challenges in other states. In MS and IN the legal challenges include Secretaries of States. I am placing you on notice of flagrant forgery in Barack Obama’s birth certificate, selective service certificate and his fraudulent use of CT Social Security number 042-68-4425, which was never assigned to him according to e-verify.

As a Secretary of state you are in charge of assuring lawful elections, free of fraud. If, while possessing this knowledge of fraud and forgery , you allow Mr. Obama on the ballot, you are at the very minimum violating your fiduciary duty as a Secretary of State in failing to assure lawful elections, at the maximum you are criminally complicit.

If someone in the city hall would be complicit with a forger, who claimed that your house is actually his house, would you be satisfied in having the same corrupt bureaucrat sending you a note, saying that he has a deed somewhere saying that your house belongs to the forger?

Would you just move out of your house and give the keys to the criminal? Of course not. You would consider that to be a complete idiocy.

You would demand the crook at the city hall to show the original deed, and if he does not provide an original deed, you would sue him together with the forger in RICO, as it would be racketeering and collusion between the forger and a paid governmental employee.

The same thing is going on here. We have a criminal, Barack Hussein Obama, unlawfully occupying the White House and attempting to get on the ballot and extend his tenure for 4 more years, while using a forged birth certificate, forged selective service certificate and a stolen Social Security number.

Two detectives from Maricopa County sheriffs department flew to HI, appeared in the Health Department, demanded to see the original birth certificate and were denied access.

Coupled with evidence of forgery in the alleged copy, this provides for a probable cause to believe that what they have, is the same computer generated forgery, not a genuine birth certificate, created in 1961. Every Secretary of State has fraud investigators.

I am sure you have one as well. In light of all of the above it is your fiduciary duty to send a fraud investigator and a forensic document expert to the Health Department of HI and demand access to the alleged original document for expert examination.

If you do not do that in light of all the evidence, you are violating your fiduciary duty at best or complicit at worst.

I trust that you will not breach your fiduciary duty and will send a fraud investigator and a forensic document expert to HI.
Sincerely,

Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ

SOME COMMENTS (May 24th) :

1. Bennett sold out. Anyone with an ounce of common sense can see he got nothing. He played (or sold out) to the left and the media’s hand.

2. Dr. Taitz, Esq.,

After reviewing an uproarious response I have conclude the following:

You have no problems in communicating a point.
You hold people responsible & accountable.
Your facts, logic, strategic, and debating excellent.
You maybe the only Lawyer I respect presently!
Your commitment to the US Constitution and our legal system shines brightly from your courage!

As a Democrat you have my respect, but as an American I must say a job well done & God Bless you!

3. This needs to be sent to every Secretary of State. We need to hold them all accountable.

4. Mr Bennet did not cave in. He has done as several judges or other law officials have done to spare themselves and their families of the threat of death that Obama and the democrast as well as republicans are bringing upon we the people.

5. This situation with Obama is an abomination on the intentions and words of the Founding Fathers. There is something very mysterious about what and who are Obama’s enablers.

On one side of the stage I see the Chicago and Hawaii scenarios.

These are local communists following long practiced plots for ‘change’.

On the other side of the stage I see the internationalists such as Soros and others who are going for Bush1′s new world order. I believe both sides of the stage are working together.

This is a very powerful/influential cabal which includes prominent politicians from all states for self service/promotion. A very tough nut to crack so to speak.

It is a marvel that a lady from another such national historical example is needed to show the citizens of the

USA

the consequences and cause of the folly of ‘change’.

6, So, does SOS Bennett seriously take the following sentence as “proof”?:

“”…..I verify that the INFORMATION in the copy of the Certificate of Live Birth for Mr. Obama that you attached with your request matches the original record in our files.”"

Why are they playing with words??

THAT REFERS TO THE INFO ON THE COLB, not how it was entered. It cannot be compared side by side!!

This should be shared and sent to every Secretary of State. The cave in was announced before Bennet even OPENED the Email he was sent from Hawaii! It no longer mattered WHAT it said. He was not going to stand firm in the face of threats to his family.

Even Bill and Hillary Clinton folded when their friends were killed to prevent them running against Obama in 2007/08.

Monday, May 14, 2012

OBAMA BUYING OFF MICHELLE OBAMA WITH GIFTS TO FRIENDS

The Department of Health and Human Services last week announced it had awarded a $5.9 million grant to a University of Chicago Medical Center program tied to Michelle Obama and run by Eric Whitaker, one of President Obama’s closest friends.

The Urban Health Initiative, which received the award, was originally based on a smaller program launched during the last decade by Michelle Obama, who was an executive at the University of Chicago Medical Center before she departed to become first lady. The UHI is headed up by Obama basketball and golf buddy Whitaker, who has known the president since Obama’s days in law school and who also vacations with the first family.

Obama senior adviser Valerie Jarrett also has ties to the UHI. Until resigning to go work at the White House, Jarrett was Chairman of the University of Chicago Medical Center Board of Trustees. And in 2007, a PR firm run by former senior White House adviser and Obama political guru David Axelrod provided provided public relations strategy advice to the UHI, according to the Washington Post.

There is no specific evidence that any of those linked to the Obamas, or the Obamas themselves, influenced the HHS decision to grant the funding to the UHI. But the large award raises questions about appearance, given the number of Obama associates connected to the program and the involvement of the first lady with its founding.

The UHI won out over lots of competition. According to HHS, some 3,000 applications were received for a share on the $1 billion in 3-year grants available. Only 26 programs were included in the first batch of awards doled out.

An HHS spokesperson said that while “final determinations” were made by the HHS’s CMS Innovation Center Director, objective standards were used in selecting the awards and the White House was not “in any way” involved in the selection of grantees.

“Applications that met the basic eligibility requirements underwent a competitive, objective review,” the spokesperson said. “Independent health care expert review panels from outside government and staff from all across the Department of Health and Human Services reviewed the applications for how well they met the criteria outlined in the grant solicitation, and made recommendations regarding funding . . . scoring was conducted by an independent panel of content experts that was organized by an experienced contractor.”

The awards have been politicized by the administration, which is touting them as part of its “We Can’t Wait” initiative to create jobs by executive action while the White House “waits” for the Republican-led House to act. The Innovation Center was established under Obamacare.

The Urban Health Initiative was founded to help link low-income patients to health providers in their communities.

According to HHS, UHI received the grant to help it, in partnership with other groups, increase patients’ access to health resources by developing an electronic database of health providers that links to electronic health records maintained by “local safety net providers.”

Last week’s award is not the first time money directed toward the UHI has raised red flags. In September, The Daily Caller reported that the private philanthropy of billionaire Obama supporter and donor George Kaiser had donated $10,000 to the UHI during 2009, the same year Kaiser secured the now-infamous $535 million government loan guarantee to failed solar panel maker Solyndra.

READ MORE CORRUPTION DETAILS OF THE CHICAGO GANG IN THE WHITE HOUSE!

http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2009/07/27/michelle-obama-valerie-jarrett-david-axelrod-susan-sher-and-their-roles-played-in-the-university-of-chicago-medical-center-patient-dumping-scheme/

Friday, April 27, 2012

THE REAL OBAMA ON RELIGION -2006 and HOW HE HAS CORRUPTED LAW ENFORCEMENT

With White House directives raining down on them to look away at Moslem terrorism ("the war on terror is over") and Eric Holder of the Department of INjustice and Janet Napolitano of Homeland Security impeding any prosecution of any anti-America activity, the FBI has sadly been emasculated - if they want to keep their jobs. Just as Clinton emasculated the CIA and FBI.

I have known my share of operatives/agents of both agencies in the past and had a respect for their toughness and dedication. The CIA under Clinton became a bunch of desk jockeys and analysts, who had never been there nor done that in the field, forbidden to talk to the FBI to share information - weakening both. Operationally experienced staff resigned in droves!

Now, with the Moslem Brotherhood running Islamic relations (bias in their own favor out of the White House, all FBI and other law enforcement or military forbidden to train agents that terrorism has links to Islam, Obama has rendered them impotent. This story below gives a good indication of this. This is not intended to tar and feather all agents and operatives but the good ones are having to keep their heads down and their mouths shut. Specially when joint anti-terror task forces are concerned.

While the GSA misuses funds, Michelle Obama takes repeated very EXPENSIVE VACATIONS (for instance about half a million dollars for a brief visit to Spain) or Obama "misuses/steals" tax money to pay for his campaigning, or spending TRILLIONS of our dollars on his weird radical agendas, FBI and CIA budgets or other law enforcement officers charged with investigating crime and terrorism have their budgets cut to the bone!

It's not a big leap to think the destruction of America and our culture and values is part of his plans. Is it not ? Prepare to be dominated by Islamic Sharia if he gets re-elected.

==================================================================

The murder of U.S. Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry in December of 2010 was the precipitating factor that led to the first news story concerning the now infamous Fast and Furious scandal involving the ATF, the DOJ, and their scheme to send American guns to Mexican drug cartels.

As that story has developed it has become clear that the government agencies involved in the scandal, including the FBI, were keenly interested in hiding certain information concerning Agent Terry's death, the most obvious being that one of the guns found at the murder scene was identified by whistleblower agents as a Fast and Furious gun and that this gun somehow mysteriously disappeared and never made it to the lab for analysis.

New information that has become available within the last 24 hours indicates another major reason the FBI in particular sought to keep the facts concerning Agent Terry's death a secret.

According to a major investigative report published on April 21 in the Los Angeles Times, the FBI was able to convince a major Mexican drug cartel kingpin to serve as an informant.

And citizen investigative reporter Mike Vanderboegh stated today that this drug kingpin is the one the FBI was attempting to protect when evidence was hidden in Brian Terry's murder.

Vanderboegh was the one who first broke the Fast and Furious story in December of 2010.

On center stage is one Jesus Audel Miramontes-Varela, a chieftain in the Juarez cartel who reportedly once fed one of his victims to a group of lions. Miramontes-Varela had been arrested by FBI agents in Denver in August of 2010 and provided a wealth of information concerning drug routes, shooting deaths, and mass graves.

Under intense interrogation Miramontes-Varela told agents that he wished to trade his knowledge of cartel activity for government protection. He claimed he wanted a new life for his wife and three children.

Interestingly, the FBI was not the only federal agency interested in Miramontes-Varela. The ATF had identified the kingpin as a major player in the Fast and Furious scandal and wanted him arrested. It was then that the ATF released a dangerous gun trafficker, Fabian Celis-Acosta, in May of 2010 on the basis of the criminal's promise that he would help them nab Miramontes-Varela and his brother.

The Miramontes-Varela brothers had illegally purchased firearms in the amount of $250,000 in the Fast and Furious operation. But that is not their only connection with Fast and Furious.

Politico reported on March 28, 2012 that the FBI failed to notify the ATF that the Miramontes-Varela brothers were paid government informants.

Upon hearing the news of the FBI's deliberate tactic of keeping secret the fact that the Miramontes-Varela brothers were informants, and that Celis-Acosta had been released by the ATF upon the promise that he would help nab the brothers, the family of Brian Terry was livid.

Celis-Acosta was one of the main players in the scheme to place U.S. guns in the hands of the Mexican drug cartels, the very activity that Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry was investigating at the time of his death.

In a statement to Politico in March of this year, the Terry family wrote,

One can only imagine that if the FBI, DEA and U.S. Attorney personnel had only shared their information with ATF agents that the Miramontes brothers were FBI informants, [then] the entire Fast and Furious debacle could have been avoided.

With this single piece of information, ATF could have chosen not to proceed with Operation Fast and Furious, which ultimately put almost 2,000 assault weapons into the hands of some of the most dangerous criminals in North America. Had this simple piece of information been shared among the different federal law enforcement agencies in Arizona, some 200 Mexican citizens would not have had to lose their lives in needless violence and U.S. Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry would still be alive.

And in another pertinent fact concerning this aspect of the case, it was Phoenix ATF Special Agent in Charge Bill Newell who told his agents to back off when they were bearing down on Celis-Acosta and the Miramontes-Varela brothers.

Friday, April 06, 2012

EXAMPLE OF OBAMACARE STYLE COMING TO USA IF NOT OVER-TURNED

Surgery bans elderly patient over her carbon footprint

An elderly woman was ordered to find a new GP because the “carbon footprint” of her two-mile round trips (ONE mile each way??) to the surgery where she had been treated for 30 years was too large.

Avril Mulcahy, 83, was told to address the “green travelling issues” over her journeys from her home in Westcliff-on-Sea, Essex, to the West Road Surgery. The surgery wrote to Mrs Mulcahy, telling her to register with a new GP within 28 days.

The letter said: “Our greatest concern is for your health and convenience but also taking into consideration green travelling issues. Re: Carbon footprints and winter weather conditions, we feel it would be advisable for patients to register at surgeries nearer to where they live.

"We would be very grateful if you could make the necessary arrangements to re-register at another practice.”

Mrs Mulcahy, a grandmother, believes the decision was made because she complained about a doctor.

“When I read through the letter, I found it absolutely ridiculous they were saying the reason was to decrease their carbon footprint,” she said. “I have been a patient at the practice for 30 years now, and there has never been any problem.

“To be treated like this, just because I live "too far away" or for what I feel is a reaction to my complaint, is disgraceful. It feels like they are just coming up with an excuse to get rid of me.”

Mrs Mulcahy said she was anxious and worried at having to try to find a new GP. “If they really cared, they could have found me a new practice instead of just basically saying do it yourself,” she said.

“It is a great worry to me as I am elderly and need to get repeat prescriptions for medication. This is really a stress I could do without. I won’t let it rest though, because I feel like I am being treated poorly.”

The West Road Surgery declined to comment. Andrew Stride, the head of governance, risk and customer services for NHS South Essex, said: “We would advise all patients who have concerns about any aspect of local NHS care to contact the patient advice and liaison service.

"While we are unable to comment on individual cases, we would like to assure patients there is a procedure GP practices need to follow before they can remove patients from their lists.”

Wednesday, March 21, 2012

STRESSING IN AMERICA

Obama stress hitting our society!

Sunday, March 04, 2012

DETAILS OF JUDICIAL CORRUPTION AND BY WHOM

by Orly Taitz

I counted to 40 attorneys who worked on Obama ForgeryGate and brought evidence, and corrupt judges and commissioners simply spat in their faces.

Some have attacked me and claimed that I didn’t do something right.

Most of the attackers were Obama’s operatives.

Some of the attackers claimed to be on our side. Among them was Dean Haskins, who promoted now defunct Birther summit, Bob Nelson (or Richard Garruth, not sure about the real name) of ORYR (ObamaReleaseYourRecords of BirtherReport, Helen Tansey, who runs Article2 SuperPack or Article2LegalFund, Arlen Williams and to some extent Sam Sewell.

They attacked me and claimed that we did not win in court until now because I did not do something right, because I did not do sufficient work as an attorney. They were telling people not to donate to my work and to donate to other attorneys. They were posting articles calling me names.

Now you can see that I was vindicated on many levels.

First, Arpaio confirmed all of the findings that I brought to court. My experts were saying the same things that Arpaio and his team are saying.

Malihi did not accept the testimony of my witnesses not because the witnesses were not competent to testify, but because Malihi is corrupt and dirty and belongs on the gallows for treason.

I flew at my own expense to HI. I spent thousands of dollars. Corrupt judges in HI disregarded a federal subpoena and disregarded clear provisions of law.

Later a gentleman by name Bill Wolf hired 2 attorneys with 40 years of experience and a corrupt judge simply sent them to hell.

Now people can see that I was not able to get the original birth certificate in Hawaii not because I did not do enough, but because corrupt judges like Nishimura (California), corrupt attorney General Luie, corrupt Deputy Attorney General Nagamine, Director of Health Fuddy, registrar Onaka are simply corrupt and treasonous and belong on the gallows for treason. I am owed an apology from all the people who attacked me and called me names.

You should go to all the people, who claim to be on our side and demand an apology issued for attacking me

Now a corrupt Fulton county judge Cynthia Wright rushed to dismiss 4 cases: mine, Irion’s, Hatfield’s. She did not even read the pleadings. She issued her prepared order within an hour or so of getting the opposition pleadings.

Just to read the opposition arguments and pleadings, to think them over, to write an unbiased opinion, responding to the argument in the opposition papers in 4 cases, takes several hours.

She sent to hell 3 attorneys, one of whom is an elected state representative, and rubber stamped complete garbage written by Obama.

She did it after Arpaio’s press conference, when he stated that Obama’s Papers are forged and there is no evidence of Obama being born in this country. This woman should be hanging from the gallows for high treason against the United States of America.

Same goes for corrupt judges Clay D. Land, Royce Lamberth, corrupt commissioners from the ballot law commission in New Hampshire, corrupt commissioners of the elections law commission in Indiana, corrupt Attorney General Eric Holder, corrupt director of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano, corrupt Congressmen, corrupt directors of news networks, who told their cameramen not to film the proceedings, not to report on high treason and forgery and fraud in the White House. (They absented themselves)

When you prepare your signs with pictures of all of those corrupt bureaucrats and judges for the April 15 rallies, think of slogans.

Please, send me ideas for slogans, I will publish them, please send me pictures of the corrupt media executives, bureaucrats and judges, who will be a part of our hall of shame.

We have to bring protesters in front of their homes, stand on public sidewalks and shame them. We need to remember their faces and their names, when it is time to try them for high treason.

Please, write open letters to every Attorney General of the state, district attorney, demand criminal charges for treason of corrupt judges and corrupt elected officials.

We need people going to the grand juries in Maricopa COUNTY AND GRAND JURY IN EVERY COUNTY, state and federal grand jury, seeking criminal charges for treason, aiding and abetting forgery and elections fraud. We need indictments around the nation.

NEWS VIEWS

stat